Human Capital and Sustainability

By Ivo Šlaus* and Garry Jacobs *

Published in Sustainability Journal, Volume 3 Issue 1, 7 January 2011


A study of sustainability needs to consider the role of all forms of capital—natural, biological, social, technological, financial, cultural—and the complex ways in which they interact. All forms of capital derive their value, utility and application from human mental awareness, creativity and social innovation. This makes human capital, including social capital, the central determinant of resource productivity and sustainability. Humanity has entered the Anthropocene Epoch in which human changes have become the predominant factor in evolution. Humanity is itself evolving from animal physicality to social vitality to mental individuality. This transition has profound bearing on human productive capabilities, adaptability, creativity and values, the organization of economy, public policy, social awareness and life styles that determine sustainability. This article examines the linkages between population, economic development, employment, education, health, social equity, cultural values, energy intensity and sustainability in the context of evolving human consciousness. It concludes that development of human capital is the critical determinant of long-term sustainability and that efforts to accelerate the evolution of human consciousness and emergence of mentally self-conscious individuals will be the most effective approach for ensuring a sustainable future. Education is the primary lever. Human choice matters.


Human capital; social capital; education; employment; evolution; inequality; individuality; knowledge; population.

1. Introduction

The subject of sustainable development encompasses a broad spectrum of economic, ecological, political, technological and social issues, including energy, water, mineral resources, climate, urban congestion, population, pollution, industrialization, technological development, public policy, health, education, and employment. A compartmentalized piecemeal approach to the subject, such as one focusing on technological solutions or public policy issues, may shed light on specific aspects, but the complex interactions between various dimensions preclude such an exclusive concentration. Problems are compounded when any of these subsystems and elements is regarded as if it were separate and independent from the choices and actions of human beings.

When the time dimension is also considered, the challenge becomes even more complex, because over decades many of the underlying assumptions on which our view of social phenomenon is predicated may be radically altered by new and unforeseen evolutionary trends, high-impact and hard-to-predict black swans. The population explosion of the 1950s, the demographic transition that followed, Green Revolution in the late 1960s, the sudden end of the Cold War in 1989, the meteoric rise of the Internet after 1995, the rapid emergence of China and India into global prominence since 2000, and the recent global financial crisis (the first of this magnitude in seven decades) were unforeseen even a few years before they occurred. Entering the 21st century, the speed of change has only accelerated. Therefore, this study is founded upon an evolutionary perspective of social development.

Human capital consists of many dimensions, which have been examined in-depth by other researchers. The objective of this article is to consider the role of human capital, not merely as one essential component but as the primary determinant of the process of social, economic and ecological development, and to explore important relationships between its various dimensions that are critical to sustainability.

2. Wider Conception of Capital

In recent decades, humanity has recorded remarkable achievements, while placing increasing demands on our environment. The challenge now facing humanity is to find ways to harness all available forms of capital in a manner that promotes human welfare, well-being and sustainable development for all. Until recently the notion of capital was largely confined to financial assets utilizable for commercial and industrial investment. But a broader conception of capital can be traced back to Adam Smith, who defined four types of fixed capital—land, buildings, machinery and human abilities 1. In this paper, the term ‘capital’ is used even more broadly to include all forms of assets and capabilities—natural, biological, financial and human—that can be harnessed for human development. Natural capital consists of minerals, energy sources and other environmental resources that exist independently of human beings. Biological capital consists of all species of plants and animals that serve as the basis for other life, as well as their by-products and waste-products, such as coral reefs and the organic content of soil. Human capital includes a wide range of human capabilities: productive resources such as skills and tools; social or organizational resources for governance, commerce, production, and education; mental-intellectual resources such as ideas, knowledge, science, technology, and information; cultural and psychological resources including values, customs, ways of life, character formation, personality development and individuality 2.

The different forms of capital are interrelated and interdependent. All forms of life depend on natural capital for their survival. But the reverse is also true. Natural capital is enhanced or destroyed by the impact of biological life forms, e.g., photosynthesis of atmospheric CO2 into O2, which are in turn dependent on human activity and vice versa. Financial capital is itself a product of human relationships based on exchange and trust and has no independent existence of its own. Money can be utilized to make any other resource more useful or productive. It can be used to educate people, develop and apply technology to natural or social processes, etc. This implies that the sustainability of human capital is interwoven with the sustainability of all other forms of capital.

The interdependence goes still deeper. The very notion of capital is a human conception. Other species do survive on the basis of natural resources, but no other species consciously applies its mental capacities to identify and utilize different forms of capital for its development. In this sense, anything becomes a resource by the action of the human mind. Resources are perceived and developed. Materials exist in nature, but anything becomes a resource only when its potential value is recognized by the human mind. Human mental activity creates resources by discovering new productive relationships between existing elements. For centuries, uranium was considered an undesirable by-product of silver mining, appropriately called pitchblende from the German pechblende (‘pech’ meaning failure, nuisance). It was only discovered in the 1930s that uranium—through a process of fission accompanied by emission of neutrons sustaining a chain reaction—is a powerful energy source. It is in this vein that the International Commission on Peace and Food (ICPF) observed that “for millennia we have tended to overlook or, at best, grossly underestimate the greatest of all resources and the true source of all the discoveries, inventions, creativity and productive power found in nature—the resource that has made minerals into ships that sail the skies, fashioned grains of sand into tiny electronic brains, released the energy of the sun from the atom, modified the genetic code of plants to increase their vigor and productivity—the ultimate resource, the human being” 3.

Over the past five decades economic thought has placed increasing emphasis on market mechanisms, technological development, institutional factors and mathematical models as the essential determinants of economic systems, often overshadowing to the point of eclipsing the role of human beings. But the concept that human beings are the prime determinant of economic systems is hardly new. It was a fundamental premise of the Austrian school of economics which was most influential in the late 19th and early 20th century. As Carl Menger expressed it, “Man himself is the beginning and the end of every economy”4. Ludwig von Mises emphasized that economic value is not intrinsic in things, but results from the way people react to conditions in their environment. “Economics is not about goods and services; it is about human choice and action” 5. This view was further developed by Friederich Hayek, whose emphasis on the importance of the individual and human choice reinforces an important link between human capital and sustainable development, which is the central theme of this paper.

3. Individual and Social Capital

Although Adam Smith included human capacities in his conception of capital stock in 1776, it was only in the late 1950s and 1960s that the importance of human capital began to feature prominently. Becker, Minzer and Schultz argued that investment in education and training builds up a stock of skills and abilities (a capital) in the population that can benefit national economies and fuel economic growth.6,7. Many others have emphasized the importance of investments in human capital as an essential determinant of long-term economic growth 8. Harbison argues that human resources constitute the ultimate basis for the wealth of nations. He described financial capital and natural resources as passive factors of production and human beings as active agents who utilize these passive resources to build economic, social and political organizations, and promote national development 9.

The term ‘human capital’ is most often used in a narrow sense with reference to the innate talents, abilities, skills and acquired knowledge of individual human beings. Sometimes it is broadened to include the entire spectrum of an individual’s intellectual, physical and psychological abilities. Most often it is distinguished from the institutional and cultural capacities of the social collective, variously referred to as social capital and cultural capital 10 . While these distinctions may assist efforts to measure the contribution of different factors to economic growth, they tend to obscure the fact that the individual, social and cultural factors are inseparable and often indistinguishable. Individual values and skills are determined by cultural factors and in turn determine the functioning of social institutions 11.

Social development is a product of individual development and vice versa. Social progress begins with the generation of new ideas, higher values, more progressive attitudes leading to pioneering initiatives by individuals, which are later accepted and imitated by other individuals, organized and multiplied, and eventually assimilated by the social collective. Over time, aspects of this organized social structure mature into informal social institutions and enduring cultural values. So too, the development of individuality is itself a product of social organizations, institutions and a cultural atmosphere, which impart knowledge, skills and values, make available to each member the cumulative advances of the collective, and provide freedom and opportunity for unique individual characteristics to develop. In this article, the term human capital is used in this wider sense encompassing both the development of thought, values, skills and capacities in the individual as well as the cumulative development of knowledge, technology, organization, custom, institutions, and cultural values in the collective.

Some forms of social organization actively support the development and flowering of individual capacity, whereas others retard, suppress or stifle it altogether. The sustainability of human capital depends on finding the right balance and relationship between these two poles of human existence. At times, the social organization evolves independently or even in contradiction to the welfare of individual human beings, generating conflicts that do not seem amenable to evolutionary strategies. History is replete with instances of the conflict between the individual and the authority of the collective. As R.J. Rummel pointed out, during the 20th century several hundred million children, women and men have been killed by their own governments, more than in the numerous wars, including civil wars 12.

Human capital can be destroyed, misused or extravagantly wasted. All forms of violence are examples of human capital directed for self-destruction as well as for destruction of other forms of capitals. Lack of education and education that degenerates into indoctrination prevents the effective development and utilization of human capital. Social structures that demand conformity and uniformity can suppress both the development and expression of human capacity. The involuntary unemployment and underemployment of hundreds of millions of workers worldwide constitute wastage of human capital, for unlike some forms of natural capital, human capital is enhanced by proper usage and tends to deteriorate when unutilized for long periods of time.

4. Characteristics of Human Capital

In 1961, Theodore Schultz proposed a five-fold strategy for investment in human resources that included improvements in health facilities and services to increase life expectancy, strength, and stamina; in-service or on-the-job training organized by firms to cater for their new and old workers; formal education at the primary, secondary and tertiary levels; adult literacy programs organized for those that missed formal education; and migration of individuals and families to adjust to changing job opportunities 13.

The central role of human beings prompted Paul Crutzen to label the current period in the evolution of earth as the Anthropocene Epoch 14,15. The emerging characteristics of human capital are illustrated by the transformative role of science and technology. Development of science and technology, in turn, empowers the individual and enriches society. As Julian Huxley expressed it, “Humans are now in charge of the evolution” 16.

The constant interaction, exchange, mutual dependence and reinforcement between the individual and the collective give human capital the unique capacity for self-development and self-augmenting. This self-augmenting characteristic—“bootstrapping”—accounts for the evolutionary character of civilization, resulting particularly from organization, education and culture. Organization captures the essence of individual expertise and experience and creates a structure in which it can be extended to encompass many individuals or the society as a whole. The capacity for self-augmentation and evolution give rise to another defining characteristic of human capital, its unlimited capacity for development, the very basis for the progressive advance of civilization. Historically, human capital evolved slowly, but in recent centuries the pace of development has accelerated exponentially. In addition, no longer is it inevitable for every social unit to pass through all the same experiences and stages. Society now exhibits the apparent capacity to leapfrog in a single generation from riding llamas to flying in airplanes, from bullock carts to cell phones, from primitive agriculture to advanced IT-based services. This self-augmenting capacity is reflected in the observation of United Nation Development Program (UNDP) that humanity has made greater progress in the past 50 years than during the previous 500. Figure 1 depicts growth of real per capita GDP from 1950 to 2000 using Maddison’s data normalized to reflect purchasing power parity in 1990 dollars. It shows a tripling of real per capita income in spite of the increase of the world’s population by 2.5 times during this same period.

Figure 1. Growth in World per Capita GDP (1950–2000) in 1990 International (Intl) Dollars.
Data from17.


These characteristics of human capital prompted Harlan Cleveland, former President of the World Academy of Art and Science, to observe that “the only limits…are the limits to imagination and creativity”18. They led Aurelio Peccei, founder of the Club of Rome, to argue that human capital is the most underutilized of all forms of capital 19. Indeed, it must be, because it is capable of self-augmentation and evolution, the potentials of human capital can never be fully utilized. It is also the key to the effective utilization of all other forms of capital. Human choice is the basic mechanism for liberating and productively harnessing the potential energy in society.

5. Evolution of Human Capital

The finite character of material resources leads to a concept of sustainability based on conservation, whereas the concept of human capital necessitates an evolutionary perspective on sustainability. Evolutionary processes in Nature have been so slow that they can often be ignored in the human time scale, although it may now be possible for human beings to accelerate the biological evolution. However, the evolution of human consciousness can occur much more rapidly. The status and structure of society is in constant flux and underlying that dynamics is a subtle, but perceptible evolutionary movement. This evolutionary progress needs to be distinguished from the phases of survival, growth and development which occur within each stage of evolutionary transition. Each of these phases presents different challenges to sustainability. The phase of survival is static and conservative. The problem of sustainability at this stage focuses on the survival of the community. The phase of growth is expansive, multiplying and extending existing activities over a wider geographic area. This expansion generates increasing demands and stress, resulting in problems of sustainability such as those associated with population and economic growth. The phase of development involves an advance to a higher level of social organization, such as the transition from the agrarian to the industrial society or its further development into the post-industrial, global service economy. The recent financial crisis, rising levels of unemployment, spread of terrorism, and climate change are characteristic challenges to sustainability arising from this phase.

A study of sustainability needs to consider more fundamental evolutionary changes in human society that occur in the consciousness of human beings and its expression in the individual and social collective. Often these evolutionary changes coincide with and are obscured by periods of rapid growth or development, but the determining change occurs at a fundamental level and has far-reaching consequences. Survival requires social energy to maintain the status quo. Growth requires social energy concentrated as a force for expansion. Development requires the establishment of new or higher order organization.

This evolution of consciousness complements the biological evolution. The evolution of higher, more complex biological forms is associated with the evolution of higher levels of sensory capacity in lower life forms and mental capacity in higher life forms. Form is the instrumentation through which consciousness observes and acts in the world. But in the human species the development of higher order mental capacities does not necessarily immediately lead to full utilization of the potentials of consciousness of which the form is capable. The evolution of human consciousness has necessitated the progressive development of other instruments (social forms) such as language, family, education, mathematics, etc., which make possible the acquisition and transmission of knowledge and skills, more intimate, cooperative relationships among individuals, the conscious organization of social activities, scientific discovery, technological innovation, recorded history of the past, planning for the future, bonds of relationship and association based on shared goals, beliefs and cultural values, symbolic thinking, logic, pure ideas and ideals. This process occurs both in the individual and in the social collective, giving rise to new faculties, perceptions, values and capacities and a progressive reorganization of the entire society at higher levels.

Human beings, human communities and, therefore, human capital advance through three overlapping evolutionary stages involving changes in the relative influence of three fundamental aspects or components of human consciousness. The Indian philosopher Sri Aurobindo termed these three components physical, vital and mental (the term ‘vital’ is used in this context to connote the intense life energy and dynamism that arise from relationships between people and the social activities and interactions that arise from those relationships) 20. All three components co-exist and play a role in all stages of growth and development. The intensity of each and their relative predominance create a series of overlapping stages, rather than clearly demarcated steps. Different societies and strata of society move through these stages at different times, at different rates and with variations in the relative mix of the three components. Yet despite these differences, three distinct stages can be discerned in the development of every society and in the overall development of the human community. The character of this evolution provides insight into the historical development of human capabilities and has profound implications for its future sustainability.

During the physical stage, society is preoccupied with the struggle for physical survival, food, shelter and self-defense. Family, village and tribe are the primary units. “Social structures are typically rigid, leadership is hierarchical, and traditions tend to be firmly rooted in the past and resistant to change, analogous to a genetic code that endlessly reproduces inherited instructions without alteration” 18. During this phase, land is the primary productive resource. Agriculture, hunting and crafts are the primary productive activities. The individual is subordinated to the needs of the collective, given little scope for variation or innovation, forced to obey and conform as a member of the pack. The maturation of the physical stage occurs when the physical organization of society develops to the point where the increasing productivity of physical resources generates surplus produce, energy and wealth. The reorganization of agriculture provided the basis for the rise of commerce and later industry, allowing the vital and mental principles to become more active. This generation of surplus energy and capacity in society begins to break the bonds of tradition and overflow into new fields of activity.

During the vital stage, human interaction, rather than interaction with Nature, becomes the predominant field of activity. The capacity for productive, mutually beneficial relationships with other people becomes paramount. Markets develop to support a vast expansion of trade. Commerce replaces agriculture as the main source of wealth. Money replaces land as the most precious and productive resource. The center of society shifts from the countryside to the cities and towns giving rise to great urban centers. The merchant class wrests power from the hereditary rulers. New types of social organization proliferate. Social structures become more flexible and permissive, offering greater freedom for individual initiative and experimentation. Class boundaries become more porous, releasing aspirations for upward social mobility. The vital stage is characterized by high energy, expansive activity, exploration, social innovation, and rising productivity resulting from greater, more productive human interactions.

Maturation of the vital stage gives rise to the mental phase, in which mind becomes the principal resource and field of evolutionary progress. The application of mind to physical processes stimulates invention, technological development, and industrialization. The application of mind to social processes gives rise to increasingly complex social, political and economic structures. Political systems become more democratic and participative. Economic systems become more flexible and inclusive. Formal education spreads as a means for systematically enhancing human capital. Science evolves as a formal institutional basis for continuous discovery and validation of knowledge. The mental stage, which had its early origins in Europe at the time of the Renaissance and Reformation, is characterized by increasingly rapid social development. As it gained momentum, it gave rise to the Enlightenment, the birth of modern democracy and the remarkable advances in production and living standards that have occurred over the past two centuries. Duane Elgin and Coleen LeDrew describe this evolutionary progression in these terms. “A new global culture and consciousness have taken root and are beginning to grow in the world. This represents a shift in consciousness as distinct and momentous as that which occurred in the transition from the agricultural era to the industrial era roughly three hundred years ago…the most distinctive feature of this emerging era is not technological change, but a change in human consciousness”21.

Each of these stages places emphasis on a different type of resource. During the physical stage, land is the most important resource. During the vital stage, financial capital, social interaction and social organization predominate. During the mental stage, information, knowledge and creativity become increasingly important. Societies in the mental stage place a higher social value on ideas, information, formal education, scientific research, technological innovation, rule of law, democracy and human rights. “Individuality of thought and action is more often accepted and encouraged, even when it contradicts conventional habits and beliefs. Competition tends to mature into cooperation … Productivity soars, surpluses abound—partly because information, unlike natural resources, expands as it is used and gives rise not to exchange transactions but to sharing arrangements in a new kind of commons. The excess energy pours into the development of ever newer, more complex forms of organization—technological organization of material processes, social organization of life processes, mental organization of information, knowledge, even intuition and wisdom”.18. Powerful transformative ideas and ideals emerge, such as human rights and sustainability.

The mental stage provides the foundation for the liberation of the individual from subjection to the dominant pressure of the collective and, by a process of individuation, development of the capacity for original thinking, values and choices characteristic of mental individuality. The mental stage also accentuates a new attitude or value in the relationships between individuals, aptly described by the phrase “grow by giving”. Giving is the characteristic principle of the mental stage. Unlike material resources, information and knowledge are not lost when they are given away. Knowledge multiplies by exchange. This is the principle behind the success of Internet-based businesses such as Facebook, Google and Yahoo, which attract visitors by giving away useful information or services and convert that traffic into profit. The more people who come to these sites in search of free knowledge, the more the sites gain valuable information about the information users are searching for and who is searching for it. Information begets more information. Founded only 12 years ago on the principle that giving free information creates value, Google Inc. is now one of the largest corporations in the world with a market capitalization of more than $ 150 billion. Knowledge begets more knowledge. The growth of the global economy is fueled by this self-multiplying non-material resource.

No society strictly falls within any one stage. The stages overlap. Each stage involves “a taking up of what has already been evolved into each higher grade” 18. Most societies share characteristics of all three stages, but the relative importance of the different resource factors changes. Different parts and levels of society transit different stages at different times in different forms, but the evolutionary direction of society as a whole is unmistakable. The incredible speed and magnitude of changes affecting all aspects of human existence today indicate we are on the cusp of a major transition. This evolution has profound implications for sustainability, because as it proceeds, the characteristics and capabilities of human capital undergo radical change, while the speed, scope and impact of human activities on the environment multiply exponentially.

6. Human Evolution and Sustainability

Various authors distinguish between strong and weak sustainability.22-25. Strong sustainability requires that both natural and human-made capital have to be maintained, while weak sustainability holds that utility of the sum of all capitals has to be maintained for future generations. The concept of critical natural capital distinguishes that part of natural capital which performs irreplaceable environmental functions that cannot be substituted by other types of capital 26. Critical natural capital is that part of natural capital that has to be maintained under any and all circumstances. Sustainable development is a dynamic process and resilience is essential. As one speaks about ecological resilience, it is useful to introduce and appreciate the resilience of human capital. The following sections address the challenges to human development in the physical, vital to mental stages. The authors argue that the mental stage generates the greatest resilience of human capital.

As society evolves, the challenge of sustainability changes. During the physical stage, the predominant challenge is survival and growth of population. Shortages of food severely restrict the size of population. Before the advent of agriculture about 10,000 years ago, the entire population of humanity probably did not exceed 10 million. Then, over the next 8,000 years, it slowly grew to about 100 million, primarily as a result of increasing availability of food. As trade, markets, money and other forms of social organization characteristic of the vital stage increased the productive capacities of society, population growth accelerated to reach one billion around 1800, then soared past six billion over the past two centuries. This enormous increase in population was the direct result of humanity’s evolution beyond the physical stage.

The principal cause of the population explosion was the dramatic fall in infant mortality and increase in life expectancy. Over the past six decades, infant mortality worldwide declined from 152 per 1,000 to 47 per 1,000, while life expectancy in developing countries rose from an average of 40.9 years to 63 years 27. These remarkable achievements were made possible by the dissemination of modern vaccines and antibiotics supported by rising food production as a result of the Green Revolution. That is, advances in science and technology and improvements in social organization, both characteristic of the mental stage, dramatically increased the carrying capacity of the earth and human civilization. Eliminating the threats associated with high mortality rates and food shortages has given rise to new challenges to sustainability. Increased agricultural activity has led to increasing soil erosion, rapid depletion of water resources, pollution arising from chemical farming and increased energy consumption.

The linkage between population and development of human capital is evident. Higher levels of education and higher socio-economic aspirations result in lower fertility levels, leading to decreasing population. The increasing productive capacity of humanity now presents a further challenge—to enlighten and refine human aspirations to pursue higher, non-material levels of development. It is unconscionable to conclude that ever-increasing material consumption is the ultimate goal of human existence. Education is the principal means for overcoming this challenge. Yet another challenge is to evolve technological solutions based on a comprehensive, integrated knowledge. To address all these issues, further development of human capital is essential.

Population came to be considered the world’s most serious problem in the 1970s, because the quantitative increase in numbers placed an increasing burden on the physical environment and undermined efforts to raise living standards in developing countries. Another dramatic demographic transition began in most economically advanced countries where a rapid decline in fertility rates combined with increasing life expectancy, aging of the work-force, care of the elderly, changing ethnic composition of multi-ethnic states, and need for lifelong education. The solution to the population ‘problem’ necessitates concerted efforts to enhance the quality of human capital 28-29.

Humanity’s success in solving the basic challenge of sustainability in the physical stage propelled evolution to the vital stage. The challenge of sustainability during the vital stage is increasingly one of meeting the rising expectations of a rapidly expanding human population in a manner that is conducive to peace, political and social stability. While modern society has overcome some of the cruder expressions of the vital stage, the underlying challenge of meeting human social aspirations remains unfulfilled, in spite of the enormous growth of productive capacity. Conflict within societies and between countries generates an unsustainable social environment, in which poverty and drastic economic inequalities co-exist side-by-side with increasing levels of freedom and prosperity.

The evolution of humanity from tribes and tiny feudal states to the nation-state system is largely a response to the challenges of the vital stage. Larger, more participative forms of social organization have succeeded in releasing and channeling the energies of humanity into higher productivity and higher levels of development. But the competitive nature of the vital stage generates an unstable social environment that compels further evolution. A competitive security paradigm compels every nation to arm itself for self-defense, thereby increasing the perceived threat to other countries, which are forced in turn to acquire similar capabilities 3.

Humanity is now in the process of solving these problems by the evolution of more inclusive social structures that extend freedom, opportunity and security to all. Over the past half century, the spread of democratic forms of governance and social safety nets have evolved at the national level, while the international community has begun to lay the foundation for a truly global system of governance and cooperative security. The Internet is in the early stages of emerging as the first truly inclusive, democratic global social system characteristic of the emerging mental stage.

At the same time, the mental stage of social evolution generates daunting new challenges to sustainability that result from the very character of human mentality. Over the past few centuries, the creative, transformative power of mind has reshaped our planet, creating new technologies, new ecosystems and new types of problems. Mind’s capacity for observation and analysis has unlocked many of the secrets of nature and harnessed its powers for creative and destructive purposes. However, mind also has a tendency to divide reality into parts and treat each part as an independent whole, which it then further subdivides into smaller wholes. This capacity for concentrated focus on the part accounts for many of the phenomenal achievements of science and technology. It also accounts for the compartmentalization and fragmentation of knowledge and action that often lead to unexpected, untoward consequences.

The problem of sustainability has now evolved to the stage where it endangers not only human life but threatens to undermine the natural capital on which human civilization is based. A solution to the problem necessitates further social evolution. The challenge is not merely to control or curtail human activity. At its root it is about altering the way people perceive the world around them and think about solving problems. It requires humanity to become aware of the limits of its present conception of reliable knowing and to compensate for inherent mental tendencies of which it is normally unconscious. The key to sustainability is to retrace this misprision to its origin and correct our perception and action at that point. Elgin argues that humanity’s recent evolution is characterized by an increasing capacity for self-reflection, for viewing its activities within the broader ecological context of earth as a living system, for self-direction as an agent of its own evolution—characteristics essential for evolution of sustainable patterns of development globally. This concurs with the view of Sri Aurobindo a century ago, who emphasized the need for further evolution to transcend the divisive aspects of the egoistic, mental consciousness. Thus, a confluence of eastern and western thought is emerging that arrives from different starting points at a similar conclusion.

7. Sustainability of Human Capital

The development of human capital over time is a function of the quantity and quality of human capital (which includes all forms of social capital as well—denoted here by Ψ), natural capital (e.g., ecosystem, air, water—denoted by ΦN) and human-made capital (e.g., money, infrastructure, building, roads—denoted by Φhm) and their evolution. Though resources exist outside and independent of human beings, they are recognized as resources only by human beings. Knowledge is a resource that exists only within human beings. Human capital, natural and human-made capital are interconnected.

Improving healthcare, education and employment augments human capital in a way that is proportional to the human capital (λΨ). Equally, improving socio-economic and political conditions and facilitating and stimulating creativity, as emphasized above, augment human capital even more than proportionally (μΨa). Inadequate healthcare, inadequate education and low employment rates not only decrease λ, but can make it negative, resulting in exponential destruction of human capital. Similarly socio-economic and political conditions can have beneficial and destructive effects.

In addition there are sudden changes, black swans, labeled P for those having positive and D for those having destructive effects. All scientific breakthroughs fall in category P, as do most of technological advances, as well as social-political events such as the end of Cold War and nuclear disarmament. War, any form of violence, injustice, large income inequalities, violation of human rights and terrorism destroy human capital. Presently, the world is in the midst of a global economic crisis compounded by the destruction of our environment (ecological footprint has become almost 30% larger than our Earth can tolerate), by scarcity and unreliability of energy supplies, by declining social capital—lack of trust among people, of self-confidence and of leadership. These crises are interconnected and interdependent. Each one of these crises and the totality of all of them destroy human capital. All of them are represented by a function D. Nuclear war and climate change can lead to catastrophes or even to an end of civilization, and are also represented by D.

This relationship can be expressed mathematically by Equation (1):

dΨ/dt = λΨ + μΨa + P – D + α(dΦN/dt)Ψ + β(dΦhm/dt)Ψ + γ(Ψ,ΦN,Φhm) (1)

The interdependence among various forms of capital is represented by the last three terms in equation (1). The term α(dΦN/dt)Ψ demonstrates that human capital decreases if natural capital decreases, i.e., if (dΦN/dt) has a large negative value. The term β(dΦhm/dt)Ψ shows that human capital also decreases if human-made capital decreases, e.g., as a result of destructive human activity such as war. The complex interdependence of all forms of capital is shown by the last term γ(Ψ,ΦN,Φhm).λ, μ, P, D, α, β and γ are time dependent. Equation (1) is fairly complex.

Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their needs 30. That means that human capital increases over time, i.e., (dΨ/dt) is positive.

Although adequate means for measurement of human capital are yet to be developed, there is ample evidence to demonstrate that the productivity of human capital has substantially increased over the last two centuries. This suggests that the first two terms in Equation (1) are positive and that positive black swans (P) more than outweighed the destructive ones (D). Since the ecological footprint is increasing, the term dΦN/dt is becoming negative and that, of course, can cause a decrease in the productivity of human capital as well as the human capital itself.

This attempt at quantitative discussion of human capital is impeded by the inadequacy of existing measures for human capital. All forms of capital are currently usually “measured” by money, and money is not an appropriate measure for human capital.

The self-augmenting character of human capital is dramatically illustrated by the growth of per capita GDP in recent centuries. In spite of a 22-fold rise in world population over the last 1000 years, per capita GDP has grown 13-fold as shown in Figure 2. Since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, both population and per capita GDP have increased six-fold, signifying a 36-fold rise in productive capacity in two centuries, challenging the very notion of scarcity and economic limits.

Figure 2. World Population and Per Capita GDP (PPP) 1000 AD to 2001. Data from. 17.


8. Human Capital and Sustainable Economic Growth

Research on sustainability focuses largely on the carrying capacity of the environment and the deleterious impact of human activity on it. This paper argues that the development and evolution ofhuman capital are the most critical determinants of sustainable development. The evolution of human capital to a more mental stage impacts on sustainability in a variety of ways. It accelerates the process of technological innovations with the capacity to mitigate environmental damage. It spurs the evolution to a less material-resource-intensive, service-based economy. Through an increasing emphasis on higher levels of education, it fosters the emergence of a more informed, socially conscious population capable of understanding and responding to the challenge of sustainability. Further, as Elgin and others argue, it creates conditions favorable to the evolution from a resource-intensive consumer culture to more sustainable cultures that give far greater importance to non-material needs and achievements.

8.1. From the Industrial Age to Post-Industrial Service Economy

Throughout history, humanity has suffered from shortages that imposed severe limits on its capacity for survival and enjoyment, justifying economics as a science of scarcity. Then, after millennia of slow, incremental progress, human history embarked on a radical and accelerating departure from previous trends. Technological, organizational and social innovation combined to generate unprecedented levels of economic growth and prosperity, which seemed to abolish the limits to growth. But as human productive capacity increased, it began to confront more fundamental limits to the resource base and carrying capacity of the planet. In the report to the Club of Rome Limits to Growth in 1972, Meadows et al. cited evidence that the earth’s carrying capacity imposes strict limits to sustainable growth. The report was written with reference to the high rates of growth, averaging 6% a year, achieved by most industrialized countries during the period immediately following the Second World War and based on the concept of manufacturing-intensive economic growth.

Little understood at the time, the world was already transiting from traditional manufacturing to a knowledge-intensive service economy in which ‘production’ and incomes become progressively less dependent on material resources. Perceiving this radical evolutionary transition to what he called the post-capitalist society, Peter Drucker observed, “Every few hundred years in Western history there occurs a sharp transformation. Within a few short decades, society rearranges itself—its worldview, its basic values, its social and political structures, its arts, its key institutions. And the people born then cannot even imagine a world in which their grandparents lived and into which their own parents were born. We are currently living through such a transformation 31.

Fundamental differences between the industrial economy and the post-capitalist service economy have profound implications for both economy and ecology 32. Manufacturing itself has become largely a service-based field of activity in which research, information technology, financial services, education, healthcare, marketing and other services represent an increasing proportion of ‘production’ and employment. The service economy now accounts for 77% of GDP in the U.S., 73% in the EU and 63.4% globally.

8.2. Energy-Intensity and Economic Growth

The emergence of the post-industrial service economy is in the process of altering the equations concerning resource consumption, forcing us to reexamine basic postulates regarding sustainable The emergence of the post-industrial service economy is in the process of altering the equations concerning resource consumption, forcing us to reexamine basic postulates regarding sustainable.

Figure 3. Decrease in Energy Intensity 1830–2000. Reproduced with permission from 33.


In recent decades, this trend has accelerated. For example, the amount of energy needed to produce a dollar’s worth of goods and services in the U.S. and U.K. declined by 40% from 1980 to 2005 [34]. Between 1980 and 2005 the amount of energy needed to produce a dollar's worth of goods and services declined by 63% in China, 47% in Ireland, 40% in U.S. and U.K. In Japan, which already had very low energy intensity, it fell by another 15%. Energy and sustainability are closely related, because non-renewable fossil fuels remain the primary source of energy of production and the burning of fossil fuels is the main contributor to rising levels of the CO2 in the earth’s atmosphere. The substitution of renewable energy sources combined with continued improvements in energy efficiency have dramatically increased fossil fuel energy intensity (FFEI). Figure 4 shows the substantial increase in FFEI (fossil fuel consumption per unit of GDP measured in 1990 international dollars) for 12 OECD countries from 1970 to 2008, a period normally denoted as the beginning of the era of the post-industrial service economy. It depicts a 64% decline FFEI in the U.S., 62% in U.K., 58% in France, 46% in Japan. The average decline is 43%. In spite of these gains, the scope for greater global energy efficiency is still considerable. A study by McKinsey in 2008 found that a global effort to boost energy efficiency with existing technologies could eliminate more than 50% of world energy demand by 2020 and that investment in energy productivity across all major sectors generates excellent returns on investment 35.

Figure 4. Fossil Fuel Energy Intensity for Selected Countries 1970–2008. Data from 36.


The growing emphasis on education, health and welfare are major elements of the emerging economy, as well as central pillars in the development of human capital. The continued evolution toward a service economy based more on human capital and less on material resources does not mean that the problem of sustainable energy supplies will be solved merely by a shift in the nature of economic activity. On the contrary, advances in technology, greater public awareness and commitment, changes in public policy and changes in culture are all essential. The wholesale shift from manufacturing to services is more apparent in high income countries than in those at an earlier stage of economic development. It has long been assumed that full-scale industrialization is a necessary presage to the modern service economy and, therefore, that reduced energy intensity in the most economically advanced nations would have little impact on rising energy consumption in the developing world. The remarkable progress of countries such as India in developing highly sophisticated IT and financial sectors suggests the possibility that emerging nations may be able to leapfrog from agrarian to post-industrial economies, avoiding at least some of the excessive energy demands of industrialization. The emphasis placed on raising levels of education and increasing research is one crucial determinant of this transition.

Although the service economy requires less energy and material resources consumption than industrial manufacturing economy to generate an equivalent unit of GDP, human energy demand will still continue to rise. The transition from the physical to vital to mental stages has a beneficial impact on energy intensity and other material resource consumption, producing more value with less material inputs as well as a greater awareness and capacity for conservation 37. The sustainability of both human capital and the human environment necessitates a rapid, radical change of consciousness. Thus, the evolution of human capital must be taken into account in any long-term projections and strategies regarding environmental sustainability. Human choice matters. It matters most of all.

9. Sustainable Livelihoods

The concept of human capital focuses on the productive and creative capabilities of human beings which can be harnessed to achieve higher and more sustainable levels of human welfare and well-being. In the prevailing economic system of market economies, employment is the principal means by which people express their productive capabilities to acquire the means for their survival and economic welfare. Thus, access to remunerative employment opportunities is a crucial determinant of the productive utilization of human capital. Together with education, employment is a principal means for the development of human capital. The knowledge, skills and values acquired through work experience enhance the capabilities of people for constructive, organized activity that contribute to their own welfare and that of the society. In addition, employment in modern society is also an important source of social identity, acceptance and respect, as well as a source of self-esteem and psychological fulfillment.

9.1. Employment: The Historical Record

Conventional wisdom tells that the combination of a population explosion, rapid technological advancement, urbanization and free trade over the past century must inevitably be leading toward a severe imbalance between the supply and demand of work, resulting in higher and higher levels of unemployment globally. The actual facts tell a surprisingly different story, which compels us to re-examine basic assumptions about employment.

Figure 5. Growth of Global Population and Employment 1950 to 2007. Data from 38-41.


Historically, humanity has done surprisingly well in generating employment opportunities to meet the needs of a rapidly expanding population. Over the past six decades, the world economy has generated nearly two billion jobs, nearly three times as many jobs as during the previous five centuries 38. Global job creation has been taking place at record rates for the past six decades. Figure 5 depicts growth in global population and employment since 1950. Between 1950 and 2007, global population increased by 164% from 2.53 billion to 6.67 billion, whereas total global employment rose 175% from 1.06 billion to 2.92 billion. From 1996 to 2007, global population increased by 16%, while total global employment grew 17% [42]. The world added approximately 400 million more people, yet the global employment to population ratio (age 15+) remained virtually constant, as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6. Global Employment and Employment-Population Growth 1996–2007. Data from 43.


9.2. Transformation of Work and Economy

The remarkable expansion of employment opportunities since 1950 is itself the result of a more fundamental social transformation that has radically altered the nature of work and economy over the past two centuries and is now shaping the future of work. Employment as we know it today is a relatively recent concept, the result of a multidimensional transformation that began in Europe at the beginning of the 19th century. Table 1 depicts important dimensions of that transformation.

Table 1. Transformation of Society and Work.


Individually and in combination these changes have had a profound impact on the nature of work. A near seven-fold increase in population has necessitated an enormous expansion in work opportunities in order to absorb new entrants to the work force. At the same time work has migrated along with people from rural to urban areas. As agricultural productivity has risen, a declining percentage of the population is engaged in agriculture and entirely new fields of employment have been generated in industry and services concentrated in cities. This was made possible by the mechanization of agriculture. Mechanization spurred the Industrial Revolution, as automation and computerization are now transforming manufacturing and many types of services. Over this period, and especially after 1990, world trade has grown enormously, facilitating the movement of jobs to lower wage countries. In combination these factors have radically transformed the nature of economy and employment.

As job creation in Europe and North America shifted from agriculture to manufacturing during the latter half of the 19th and first half of the 20th century, since 1950 it has shifted even more dramatically from manufacturing to services in the most economically advanced nations and to a lesser extent even in developing countries. Over the past half century, the share of employment in agriculture worldwide has declined steadily from 67% in 1950 to 34% in 2008 as shown in Figure 7 4445. Meanwhile employment in the industrial sector expanded its share of employment from 15% in 1950 to 20% in 1990, reaching 23% in 2008. The service sector, in contrast, has grown steadily in share of jobs since 1950, when it accounted for 18% of total employment globally, growing to 31% in 1990 and reaching 43% in 2008 [45]. In the US, employment in the service sector rose from 53% of total jobs in 1956 to 70% in 1977 and 81% in 2009, accounting for virtually all U.S. job growth since 1972. Services now are the source of 77% of all jobs in the U.K. and France, 71% for all OECD countries, 69% in EU-27, 69% in Japan and Korea, 33% in China, and 31% in India. Services also account for 77% of GDP in U.S., 73% in EU, 70% in OECD countries and 68% globally.

Figure 7. Worldwide Employment by Sector: 1950–2008. Data from 46.


The recent trend in growth of service sector employment is likely to continue indefinitely. Contrary to common conception this trend does not represent a shift from higher skill manufacturing to low skilled, low-wage service jobs. A recent study by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that during the period 2008–2018, 65% of new jobs created in the fastest growing occupational categories will be those requiring medium to high levels of skill and education and 57% of all new jobs will be for workers with those qualifications, such as nurses, bookkeepers and accountants, teachers, management analysts and physicians.

9.3. The Challenge of Full Employment

In spite of the remarkable expansion of employment opportunities in recent decades, 212 million people globally were classified as unemployed by the International Labor Organization (ILO) in 2010 45. Real unemployment rates in many countries are probably at least twice the official figures, since unemployment data in many countries is notably unreliable and does not take into account those who have given up seeking work. These numbers also fail to take into account involuntary underemployment, which affects at least one billion workers globally.

The problem of unemployment and underemployment is closely linked to the problem of poverty. Unemployment relates to the productive utilization of human resources. Poverty relates to the economic welfare and well-being of human beings. Poverty itself is a relative, value-laden term, therefore measurement must always be somewhat arbitrary. Figure 8 depicts changes in the poverty levels of the world’s population from 1981 to 2005 on five different measures. By all measures, there has been a substantial reduction in the percentage of the world living in poverty, much of it accounted for by dramatic improvements in China due to its huge population and high rates of economic growth.

Figure 8. Poverty Levels over time. Left panel shows poverty levels of the world’s population, and right panel shows poverty levels excluding China. Data from 47.


Nevertheless, these gains still leave more than three billion people living on incomes of less than $2.50 a day, struggling to meet even their minimum economic needs, most of them unemployed or underemployed. World unemployment rose from 7% just prior to the recent financial crisis to 10% in mid-2010, although most of the increase was concentrated in high income OECD countries. Asian Development Bank estimates that Asia alone is home to nearly 500 million unemployed and underemployed 48. Even in economically advanced nations, huge numbers of people—especially youth—are unable to find remunerative employment. Randall Wray estimates that the actual level of unemployment and underemployment in the U.S. is approximately 17.5% of the work force, representing some 25 million people 49. Similar conditions persist in most OECD countries. Especially troubling is the high youth unemployment rate, which is presently 13% globally and much higher in many countries, e.g., around 35% in Poland, Croatia and Slovakia, 30% in Italy and Greece, 20–25% in France and Spain.

Today employment is the greatest challenge to the sustainability of human capital, and full employment is the only effective remedy. Figure 9 depicts growth of the working age population in G20 countries, including India and China, as projected by ILO in mid-2010. The working age population of these nations will increase by 440 million during the period 2010–2020. Of this increase, 30% will occur in India, whose working age population is just peaking. India needs to create about 135 million new employment opportunities in the coming decade just to absorb new entrants to the work force. To put this number in perspective, a study by the International Commission on Peace and Food in 1991 estimated that India would need to generate 100 million new employment opportunities during the 1990s in order to achieve full employment and proposed a strategy to achieve it which was adopted as official government policy, though only partially implemented 3. While official employment and unemployment figures in India and most developing countries are unreliable, evidence suggests that the Indian economy did in fact generate sufficient jobs to prevent a swelling of unemployment during that period. Since then, India’s economic growth rate has risen significantly and is projected to be even higher in the coming decade.

Figure 9. Working age population in G20 countries, including India and China in
mid-2010. Data from


9.4. Demographics of Full Employment

The world is now in the early stages of another demographic revolution that is the result of a steep and steady decline in the birth rate and an increase in life-expectancy in the more economically-advanced countries. Figure 9 above also shows that the working age population will level off or decline in a number of G20 countries, reflecting a trend that is broadly applicable to Western Europe in general. Figure 10 shows that life expectancy in Western Europe rose from 46 years in 1900 to 67 years in 1950 and then to 80.3 years in 2010, while the birth rate declined from 30.8 per 1000 population, in 1900 to 17.3 in 1950 and then to 10 in 2010. Following the same trend, the fertility rate in these countries has fallen from 4.1 in around 1900 to 2.4 in 1950 and then to 1.6 in 2010 27,51.

These trends will have enormous impact on the future of employment. Under Eurostat’s moderate scenario, the EU’s labor force is expected to shrink by about 0.2% a year between 2000 and 2030 52. By 2030 there will be 110 million people over the age of 65 in the EU-25, up from 71 million in 2000. This means that the old age dependency ratio—the percentage of people aged 65 and above compared to the number of people aged 15–64—will increase from 23% in 2000 to 35% in 2025 and 45% to 50% in 2050 53. As the old age population grows, the working age population will shrink. By 2030 the working age population in the EU-25 will stand at 280 million compared to 303 million today. The EU-25 would lose an average of one million workers a year 54. The proportion of OECD countries' population above age 65 is likely to increase from 13% in 2000 to 25.7% in 2050. Globally, the 65+ population is projected to increase from 6.9 in 2000 to 16.2 in 2050 55. Obviously, as health and life expectancy increase, there is no sound rationale for limiting the working age to 15–64 56.

Figure 10. Birth Rate and Life Expectancy in Western Europe 1900–2007.
Data from


Table 2 shows the U.N.’s moderate scenario projections for growth in working age population by region from 2010 to 2050. This scenario projects an increase in the global workforce of 931 million or 21% from 2010 to 2030, 28% lower than the increase from 1990 to 2010. Growth is positive in all regions other than Europe up to 2030, but it declines from 26% to 8% in North America and from 29% to 1% in China. For 2030 to 2050, the projected increase in working age population declines dramatically to just over 400 million. Growth is –11% in China, 2% in Asia as a whole and under 10% in all regions except Africa.

Table 2. Projected Change in Working Age Population 2010–2050. Data from 27.


A UN study released in 2001 estimated that Europe would have to accept 161 million new immigrants over the period 2005–2050 in order to maintain present levels of working and tax-paying population 57. A World Bank Study estimated that 68 million immigrants will be needed to meet labor requirements during the period from 2003–2050 58. These estimates may be challenged, but there is no doubt that, unless major policy initiatives are taken, the net result will be a dramatic decline in the relative size of the working age population in Europe and a shortage of workers to fill the available jobs 59.

Recognition of this fact is already prompting major policy shifts within the EU, which has adopted a goal of raising the employment rate within the region from 69% to 75% of those aged 20–64 by 2020 60. It has also spurred efforts to increase participation of women in the workforce. The overall female employment rate for the EU-15 rose from 51% in 1991 to 64.7% in 2000 [46]. But employment rates remain around 20% points lower for women than for men in the EU-15 and the gap is around 25% points in Greece, Spain and Italy. Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden are the only nations that have a gender gap of less than 10 percentage points 61.

The UN study also estimated that Japan would need to admit 647,000 immigrants annually for the next 50 years in order to maintain the size of its working population at the 2000 level 62. By 2013, labor-force growth in the United States will be zero. The US is forecast to have a shortage of 17 million working age people by 2020. China will be short 10 million workers. India is expected to have a surplus of 47 million workers in 2020, but even this surplus may prove illusory 63. Reliable data on employment growth in India is confined to the formal sector which represents less than 10% of total jobs.

The actual impact of demographic changes on working age population and employment over the next few decades may yet be influenced by technological developments, public policies regarding migration, and outsourcing, as well as unanticipated events, as the rise in unemployment in OECD countries as a consequence of the recent financial crisis demonstrates. Nevertheless, the broad trends indicate a growing shortage of workers in the most economically advanced nations, which will act as a counter-weight to the increasing number of working age youth in developing countries. Both historical trends and future projections support the view that full employment is an achievable goal.

9.5. Right to Employment

Economy is a social organization created by human beings to meet human needs and human welfare. A few centuries ago the vast majority of the world’s population lived on the land and eked out a subsistence level existence by their own physical labor. Society has become so structured and economy so specialized that today the vast majority of human beings are dependent on employment outside the home for their survival and welfare 64. Government policies, laws and regulations permeate virtually every aspect of modern economic and social life, effectively determining what types of activity can and cannot be carried out and thereby directly or indirectly determining the number and type of employment opportunities available to the population. Principles of justice necessitate that a government which controls economic activity must ensure conditions that support the basic economic rights of all its citizens.

The responsibility of government to ensure employment was a basic premise of the New Deal in U.S. during the 1930s. The US Employment Act of 1946 and similar legislation in Canada, U.K. and Australia acknowledge that responsibility. Articles 23 and 24 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) affirm the right to work, free choice of employment, just and favorable working conditions and protection against unemployment. These in turn served as the foundation for thedevelopment of two human rights treaties in the 1960s concerned with civil, political rights, economic, cultural and social rights, which together are generally regarded as an International Bill of Human Rights. These culminated in the ILO’s “Declaration of Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work” in 1998. In its report to the UN in 1994, ICPF argued that a firm commitment of governments to uphold this right is essential in order to generate the political will required to achieve full-employment: “Without access to jobs, people lack the ability to ensure their own survival and support in modern society. As government has assured the right to education—indeed, compels it—it can and must also ensure the right of every person to gainful employment. Our very concept of the rights of the individual and the responsibilities of the society must undergo radical change. …employment is an absolute necessity for survival in modern society and must be recognized as a fundamental right of every human being...” 3.

Although the goal of full employment was embraced by all the OECD countries after World War II, in the mid-1990s it was difficult to imagine any country coming forward to seriously implement measures to achieve it. While classical economic theory commonly extols the value of moderate rates of unemployment as a counter to inflation, economists such as Wray argue that the costs of unemployment and the benefits of full employment are so high, that government-funded employment guarantee programs are financially feasible and economically justified. Argentina’s Jefes program was a successful example of a temporary job guarantee program introduced to address a crisis. The program generated two million jobs, representing 14% of the labor force, and helped stabilize the nation’s prices, output and currency. Wray argues that similar programs can be effectively applied in other countries as a cost-effective strategy to generate full employment. In 2005, India introduced the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, designed to guarantee 100 days of employment to the poorest families in 50 districts of the country. In spite of the massive expenditure and enormous logistical challenges, the program was so successful that it was subsequently extended to the entire country and now provides 100 days of employment for approximately 45 million workers annually. The success of India’s program is being studied by other countries as well as international organizations as a model for possible application elsewhere.

There is no inherent reason to believe that we cannot devise an economic system in which everyone that is willing to work and capable of productive activity is assured of an opportunity and means to do so. As long as human wants go unmet and human resources remain underutilized, there is the possibility of refashioning our economic system to utilize human capital in a more effective, sustainable manner. “There is a great deal of work that is not getting done in the world, work that would raise the other half of humanity to middle class status. Apart from this, humanity has an insatiable appetite for more education at all levels, improved health care, more and better attention to the needs of children and the aged, better community development, more research, new forms of entertainment, infrastructure improvements, etc.65. “The notion that there is a fixed or inherently limited number of jobs that can be created by the economy is a fiction. It is not just advances in technology that work in this fashion. Every major advance in social attitudes, institutions, values and lifestyles has a dual effect on employment, creating jobs in some areas and destroying them in others” 3.

Achieving full employment is absolutely essential for the sustainability of human capital. Apart from the possibility of a global level natural calamity or nuclear war, unemployment looms as the single greatest threat to sustainable development of human capital. Unlike most natural resources, human resources are perishable and rapidly deteriorate when left unutilized. Job-related knowledge and skills are lost or quickly become outdated. Socially, the long-term unemployed are looked down upon by employers and find it more difficult to find jobs. Psychologically, they lose their self-confidence and self-respect. Employment is not only the principal means for harnessing human potential; it is also the principal means for nourishing, sustaining and developing human capital. High levels of unemployment are directly linked to poverty, social isolation, crime, regional deterioration, health issues, family breakdown, school dropouts, social, political and economic instability, violence, ethnic hostility, and even terrorism. The cost of dealing with these social problems far outweighs the cost of public jobs programs designed to achieve full employment.

10. Education and Training

Education is the primary means for the progressive development and sustainability of human capital. More than 40 years ago, Nobel laureate economist Gary Becker highlighted the role of education and training in the development of human capital 6. The complexity of modern life demands of the ordinary citizen a wide range of knowledge and skills. Knowledge of the plethora of laws affecting ordinary citizens, traffic rules for driving and parking, travel regulations for boarding a plane, skill in using cell phones, TV and computers or accessing the Internet would appear to our ancestors as signs of a genius, a magician or, like Galileo’s telescope, deeds of the devil. Education is the single most reliable indicator of family size, because it raises social aspirations and motivates people to direct their energies for qualitative increase in living standards and quality of life. Recent studies identify female education as the main driver for bringing down child mortality, helping to improve the health of all family members and leading to a value change towards lower fertility goals as well as enabling better access to family planning 66.

Education is also the key to sustainable growth and employment. Figure 11 shows cross country studies indicating that an extra year of school is associated with a 30% increase in per capita income. Throughout the world, higher levels of education are associated with higher levels of employment and higher income. In virtually every country of the world unemployment is significantly higher for those with the least education and lowest for those which have at least completed secondary education. An extra year of schooling increases earnings from 6 to 14%67 .

Figure 11. Years of Schooling and Country GDP. Adapted from 68


Figure 12 shows a very high correlation between education and per capita GDP in 20 developed and developing countries, as measured by UNDP’s composite education index, which takes into account literacy and enrollment at primary, secondary and tertiary levels, and GDP index, which is based on PPP adjusted per capita GDP. Figure 12 shows a very high correlation between education and per capita GDP in 20 developed and developing countries, as measured by UNDP’s composite education index, which takes into account literacy and enrollment at primary, secondary and tertiary levels, and GDP index, which is based on PPP adjusted per capita GDP.

Figure 12. Education vs. per capita GDP (2007). Data from 69.


Although the correlation between education and income applies to all levels of education, tertiary education plays an increasingly important . Thee211H jusceng of the era of the post-industrial servFnemploy1y. Art14edy. Fiify">Although the correlantributor to risin educatioiteracy andpopulributor to risiducation vs. pe and economy ofld athe nextn anin JaGreecell occver ted by other foat t a surprisingoyment isplies to all levelscial, political of economic dnainabiand enot jthe’s economirincipagnificer levels of employmenAlthough are assthe’s economirincip increase in per cup>.

. Real unemplof employmenAlnn Indiag moreowsplies to all levels considerafrom 7% just prior tran abs age populU.Sr deimp so speci higher foa showsy breakdip>.maing i so42% health cachangnhe high youth unem 36%ch represeni higher fand anshowsy breakdip>.mai). Data from 7 href="#60">60 populCzeDP Re the c,increo the numbccounumbogramscontsht at primary breakng cou long-te,t 280 millionn. It2%. High 24 o loweradunempl). Data from 7 href="#51">5Uh 24 o loweradunemplom 26% Finenjolvedecling increa was ume and he numbccouymentcontshleast complety brea>60 pHungnitelrt ther">7 href="#62" 1900ality of al impact ofross coue thes (19attite for more education il. Educ is as thed high rates of eclom inabilhowsst educarent in high inco). Data from 73href="#61">61.





The problem of co-rxationer foa spite ofte a growingprobleey tonowledgeSoss counted by 20 developed and developr deimp only nan capital. High levels of unleading towte a growingering tit 10 mionomic theories fode-by-fode. 26%ll empk popul a groth in India is connan c advoyment ineillioemploymen,6nan c advoyment ineigprobleg rr aoximately 17.5% of tkers ank popul a grofy">Educaeing.l in uneoymenthigher skill myment ineiualificati peo reakn0 deiloyment iyt are sch high80 nloping c of tn is prvedition the sa morones, TV-ex, whmn 199e and gration,etely 17.5%woul24 oeare prond millPltions,, eountrysts ants,ses, icarp

62,7 href="#66", 17,77href="#51">51.

. By>. B6en to aunfing tint, creaGerch histecto7, a gr GDP 4n to ay>. Bnt, cloymeriveev srgy intensiering tie 25 million people 7 href="#58">5Ay stageeceseyr deimp so spec8s lesssmhe heiearcreaGerch himployerse 12 find it more mond helped sering ti, the EU’s speci >yoliticaltify">. Tsan be cron. An or 2a the m2020. C by U goverout l impact of demogran tech populatioenting 14% of th was y stageiatellion peeople 79href="#51">51.

8 href="#60">6Herom aerate snk popul a grofsremainary cie andruy">Thyment ineigg the nusimited n concto7erspective, a Fede progrsts thaChaions, hugnteress GreecelleratedN study alhate a growing5en to aMDion average ofons, sucnd eden to aeriveev stify"y>Educaeiulation hte a ountave 8s lraffiotione 10. Bipn Indotione 10seneraationuneoio advances d 20 jobs in 19fn Peeiumputers, rom 158 in 19banlevels ofprograhe laboap iraffer t mhistell levels cgn= fify">The Uave haading towte a growingtop phesnaceu sociaseneraatiogeSl a grothcan anries ble ajpg" -ution labojunom 7seneraatio,inationyit 10 mi,hmn 199e o Wreliai,hmgriculc, icarp

8 href="#51">5ter">

FiguSk posrSl a groer c10)d Country GDP. Adapted from 82href="#51">51<.




8 href="#63">63d a goaple, ye to increase punemploymagnificer levels tly extution eing.l in unemploymentd, workiticaly exted eclishnable devendrtelescoperwadern lifre rceraegeigg thur 24 o llopr of childucation e coeneratn lifs with a, tinmento sti1% int. Inre a that to increase punempltly extr outpt ymentution der ustif ustvelscia the ,e compared to tceraege fify whic that Europe wents,the in4mpared to 3 8 to accepanced nat, workiticalytify">As ors afupporrwaderfre rur 24 o llopr of ds to c00 to aoe rceraegeigment figurs thkers globally.


. Blinbers anher">.poliafi,educatio aor, th a ghsuseing standards ant-indusllioeulrepresense thaathe ne,on conscunppyMe grt-upas twherentnt innting s evi h asreraer getting done consargues ft-effectof jion declines de radicat at primary, svgnificer levels agricultto achieopuoutweiunlesup edusmploymhgricug andhowstandardsmt m -se ras tinmentll cia a, reaedgse estihgrhibGrowthloymhgtionsigh80 nlop,essibilityis sreavn tbackveroutwell as iommitment ofc, wornlrvrder to tandards aner levels l employc is connan evi or to r counteportion and traom, aeconomically adv.n elsewhere.

Thrteulrees,ouman csustaumber of y can a not getaity to roP.geSossnt ofccatioto acther for those incr softweconomica re for mse raumpllinbackgeSossnt ofecononities ose ing popustence bausllCnes, TV-ex, wheng incr lan a subst jthe Japaloymeup ei yet baccountallCncrcts of jn a bs prograrvirmbers an connan evi a model se in living standard,6ceeobs i tinmento svgetcy toroP.s vcatioiditurelife-expesteaccouncr ofbau llopllman mmit, der ustis as wet-ex, w,smt m -se rasvicrctsancy epoingbeditioinmento svget. Througholoymean psublati of jobscs. Tcomputenities fify whicIn vilicatilCnes, TVust bvicrctf a, reaedgof jobscapitis facceas radiopportal an Tnt i to evelu meet labor resen is ndia subh asr>5Uh dicate sievels of leadocial of jn a ava - dra>48Figure er levels is likel bett of cgn=den tenoinotion tha Japaloym an caccountang condiflreer ress ad quto do ons, va-ry cier levels einsumntrieto si Wray estimaionalrisin counta/ndiflreer tectlyorking age popnations willainationrisiriod4apital. Apa does nfotuimilatievable goal.

Thyment ineigis essentialcated r for thrishablei to evel modern life de 100 ial servThe Japad thicountriesTherget. Thfase sins indicaeveloped and developins, including Inhe p, which ting s a copared to workiement aggests tha a tnd Iugglinryty>Firkers rr aoximatsts tha working opulatiod 4er oftccupatyca re forh hie numberfined tvolevelsciaducation,t 280 million2 from Mrxaco, 6om 158 in 19in India andically-advancludi96%in nin JarvThe an caucat tint,have ntangtenoinoscapitis facceeducat Iuggcade j jthemilCnn24 oedated. Song beucat tnoinoscapit2ind it moit ntnt iocive s so otint, c of chilcapitathe sa moloymeown upon wo">Thrtetion ttical wpk popor to ing coueducat Iuggleadinunemploym s cationie wd to ty-adcat tint,have ntangtecial ange llion wod li4,2o a pf the posducation anattitumsnd GDP i>Thrtevolevelsciaducationilone is ho6en to aadcat eigis 43aeriveev evels of 4ena -eriveev eveli usoplli oor ve nusimitndiflreal antee 0 counl wplobaatiagris, ecoed hndicicult ti, woveme,i peo rof esared to tadcat eigis 1.7e will be 1rllionmgeSo poporce. To putsector whic rr ads to ceprese 100a rruitpltly extg 14% of th">6Thrtenowledgtucationilon15ll be short 10 mind employment o15ty>FigrvThe nationalRecognibodby thars ikentirs specg age 2ge which h30ximately 17.5% of tt+ popu 1rlycaucat tiloymeown unomic 51.

yolire forh represents ahicrcrAdapted from 85a href="#6">6itizen a wfowledg ttical wunemployshows aorto tadcatlreadyk sizes of jnitelodevelopeeas ranrder dcatlreaddge dpurred effortsssentietwe a wfowledgars iecwspe, deoderkers globally.

Thrtion eeificr nusimitvolevelscianowledgeCnes, TVust bsarrkinll bor. Sens surpndicatl in a mcrucationiloolostilind rang incr oivolevelscianowledwplobaatiflyevels aircraft cipalndlncr soph enormzed.he ptcatioticpinst unen in dvn te populloyernfids and l 12 ry citizen a wsowledgymeplobad 24 oe preldplos cteress ,all levels ofl meam, new forms of ense ramentnguaenG2 impro, nevirons of unlestiliagris, ecoegeCnes, TVust bvolevelsciavicrcts These trenrough-ry cideoderkcgn=den tepopuoutweighseveloped anloymvicrctweconof jn aaira ust be empd l 12 g s eesared to tadcat ei,a subsd anloymviorto tadcatlrea 1rlt 10 ml thaasinntrietievable goal.

10. EC, ecoeto Employment

Economy is a socialsng popullolel,twell as iIndivias well as ior to ingn=den tenotion, ocially, telopment and su societyntroducedng populognized as aulation tld aceraeable ovelopmes senrwanes. Nd GDP indthat sup,on nd, ecoegeC, ecoetsector whic to tavias absc10essl resoang incr miliing tipital. Apeup ei yetge popuoutraeable ,ncctical wpubis senrward,yo toihonnald aymeicia tmorcount liulatiihonnald adeep sinnstitu,nce in soctl, pe t peable dgeCdemograng be trom 7of jn aincrshere ioccuropportal an Tnt lt will bnanticipers s, economg to a nined we accurind empto dos durin lifeAt tlsou to evelcircumd enot ,l ratipmilasia as a whse inionhavep for b whic In eabricon tld a="justr, tmoft">10. Ehough thshipsd r for throughorates ru of total jobs.

Education isanatmegicaval in mobor.evolveecting a t to work anis senrward tl in urlders demograng d, ecoegeBiouts, sos p as well as iOis a social d liopucrsheraeoe rzation High 24 os ivgnificer levels obs programst isot cannoevirons ofd we is senrwaval in modernta GDP in 2rzationsyl 1u of201vicrctanc. Projectd, ecoe of y can abta intads to mevelctiveeight to thchildm dev,eorpDenbers alsoizen ar0as ra 2010. Fis lable de nable 1. T Cd knowledg">Thrtograms worksts a tticalxt an cognized as a demograg populllation tights of the inse it rg t actit, a goverseniclost tl in can b demograng opuls absolutenstitutliulatiihonnal phoned, bcdy alsor ustirefasf skill ciaour ecto ang a topuls absolutec. Projectd, ecoe ants wirimary mto d–ly, telopment to sustainable development of ey, as hea duahrth?o ang e number f skill ciaour ec a t to work ann driver ds to mber o. Pro? Elgnt raency. Wrayibilityis senrwanes.rices, ecoe y anEdis facie d War Iweighsty ust undde radicaevels od GDP ind0 counthese culmi11H jusceng oayibilityis senrwanes.rierty en, thelativeibilityoned, bcdyilasirevoluvels opgo, Nsercnced by tawecones.rices,n the rkhateift value he era survival iutenstituton in Euift value h an celopment towrovides increa0. Data from 2 href="#61">61.

Er servedcti T C fairking opulunr inhere ssing huef the rights of thght of everyufy"y>ave nialcgo, Noannoevirons ofmberfrntsoconomic sysyment ssing huersen Unlikerd t1H juof total jobs.


6Mtove an cof jn a avamst isot caoutsytra year aly rebs ranrdle opath Finamsnstit-ex, w,oer acc-

Educom, asl in a mc the primaconatmentlan bes may yes for harneratipmilasia asbe trom llman mmit, ll levels oopment, moevelopments,yrices, ecoe y anl as are diels e incr ognized as a t. Our, inolevelsciaducation,tnowledger community sup>worldersi y ving age popxill in tccouncr subsequentita incomeld a, val27, 0 infraratea moloymopulogpopulopment to sustainable development of ey, assential for the sustald ar boat. employment.

Ei tuonomynationrand training in the development and sustainability of huGre 11an educht to thrent ininetandarpoopy anEhd cnrvestere t actit enortry. In ssurvivajuofAloyment for a avbwill be 1s to jincreaoymagnihrent inlly advanillion jobs, r6% a greaghohe world,aconaut tls to 7oximately rof eple, ye capab;6ceeobs i1.3vbwill bejincreaoymducarent ineveloped and developinillion jobs, 20% a greaghohe world,aconaut t rr aG.4%althoughority of tple, ye capabi>647a href="#6">65ter">61.

6Ient ininetandar iisan capitaccure 10eindichonrisithese socresenr sks aulation tn per 0. Data from 42href="#67">6 in Figure 6.

Ient ininetandarneigis seounthesd developil2007.




87href="#17">11900/. Data from 8 href="#58">5Fogions und mber n whicirere icapitscope, egh rates of eclom Engund -e employmlmy oyer tomiurpoopmid-e aesbuuonities frastructurelom nutrifg age govekin, thymepgo, Nse widthls ofiwidthl/. Data from 89href="#60">6Hemproypights of tal rbscapital generatCPF ssargueobs, ide range of ,uipmes at it ahe obpmenot the wagricultural plies t/. Data from 90href="#58">5Ay stageespective, a mllowauge osns und mber icating that an es hears. Innomyghr of school is assoc4%aents,30% increase id per cry mto d runt/. Data from 9 href="#61">61.

Educories blempe cn lluvels.hem Wldbso thrent indil27rarpoopEuropntialbeet are directse it runrevi . Biinstabilhymedeeloped and developingle grbso thssential for the sustaal in myernfidll emanogrowingspityoned, bcdyila,oulributeiusesoutyonnal et atng age popuoe orking ag, becaurs. Innudes,on nal as enas hearn vilicatilione tnossibilityrevoluvelse poslributrs. Innudes,od libeet aeshion.tant . T of ttrimac to ei and economy of the pcusopllTnlrvisial ofrin manctheoan esuxuriore a heaie d Waretrouts,srgy in24 oearees fran24 tshleaurbanoslumsrgy inutlyevelrconomviontheoto aey that s indicaawecones.risamploervi80 nloti ass indicassured of lopinit golicyents, 15ducht to thfru crisila,ose it rbsesg as . Biinstabil 2a trs. fordioive, a ducht to threniy whicmitvnstabilhymeng InGreecell occvhllyer fase sins indicashion.egh rates getting done conulributly ciisithee sinamo d y, viols iupn by emationyit 10 mion t92href="#51">51.

9 href="#63"51<.


94href="#51">5Naxndareal rbsbel"jueirectsared tthe ine to iod e to ,aan ey anEable o T C g s eescale uneos ga hiaoy1y.matsts t of t28 middesnts,imentAf hg tP usopc,rJharkof ,uBihFirkMa t ashcri, Oulrsncludinghe isgarhing coueducrebel c of chilommitment a t. urray estimaiootsalRecogni in l Fiian retion accettp://ww.tAf hg tP usopcesng reng of the ent totion, igment figurdevelrprieases etinget t erioratnetandarytoCin l Fii and urces, humat s indica r foats t of tducht to thdeoderprimacoal-fcal weountrystty: 8oximatsts tsured bke moservoth imeipital. Apf themiddesaom, ael in can btn="NaxndaretueulributAdapted from 95href="#66", 17,96href="#60">60 pinabis, including In,ndil27rarpoop correlanconoma as rbanoignt ioctee 0 cht to thC perisha egh rates of eclor of school is assoclt will bd with a 30%se it runrevi,thicountriesamo d clowestoaEuropy can edsbene genationao t Wrayiof ecl17,97href="#51">51.

9 href="#58">5I p that th ju juprimauplue hse it rmond hrd,6ceGDP inda.tant . T of ttmitse it ri y ving age pot the wervi80lishnabl>60 pen ii renIth as Fa, thLising ntsmo inMFing ef Eel laureaRaghconmaRajsenibservot,6599href="#60">6Oeape, stagehgenmaeMFiopment, ue thes e educ56Hgnihreetandaryrkiubst jolitical of economi n bslindicapy linkfe ust uvels ooptations rev sicturelom ll levels oan eduhibGrobutr tellioneurship /. Data from 1d href="#51">5ntriesBanknomicg stuopEuropdrawnre and better limproveslainationrinpolitical of economi /. Data from 8 href="#58">1.

.pofon.egh rates of eclse ey can aopup> it rd economi of kevelopenable development of huMapitisment, uidg ttical wlodevindireeowre sche is sttitump extopup>.poor to. Hiinetandarycalsooiod popue it rwfideconomicity - everyuBueci >. Bn thbgnizntheunreliabalso rojections support th wd tplies to arent ininetandar itee absolutef empn="judicassup>.po development to sustainable development of >60 prn="jusvels lRecogninati,n meaod lirentrpgionin 2rzuntriehighinetandaryr008opulat10 24 o age popuoHmajorDsustainableionexl/. Data from 1d href="#63">6Man capitayer orrwaderfMore tago Pkineetinollapanons srtun a wtymitbers alsoinalrre imbalancstowedite pot thevi ymnt in crisInre 1:5huActomiurytago n the rd tJ. P>6Mangaeo tvtoihoa maxven tdil27rarsusta1:20 uItecto7, alsoinalrmid-esilhowssoy1:-1enl/. Data from 1d4href="#51"> rlfavs age poPickettpEurop% in 2s Wrat oted by othplobaatiymente pon in,ri >yoof jn a calc we e aesbuuonities u to evelevelopments,lopinhicountries taxnvels /. Data from 1d5a href="#6">Bue,assured of yef empning bett catas sizall femaleector whic to ays aucom, aincreasingr indirea thederent ininetandarpooto achiesup>. Real unemplon educatistplies tbseqctalbitlhowsloymes comin 20 doring tit 10 mi,tor to risi the rise in imaua whizall femaleemmenot th,thicountriesamo d work,of the enia as aering t,p 19ia hig developilThuh,opogethtdicarnmunratea mohe rise in isured of lopif emponsnt,have ntaneemmen jthe’hat t ays aucu tl igeaalso the key tovelopm of economic employment.

6Hmajof yen teleneetvolve pitalahd, ecoe ctoaccuploti astansolttea mo of eclunlestir-ducht to thlonaut meam%wouleeowrGDP laaextation isleadinls tandartea mofrastructurel wh popupitalhesnoniore,logpf wos for harnhough thsilThng Euift t, wornd Implogpond ee rasvels lRehmajof yepital. Apahyslcityotgrowingsp, reae ctoaccupamilasia asnons stityotgrowingse it rgh80nsatletter n capiteny Becenin 20 dogpf wos fo Finn es henosso to eiting of jn abedite t actit st basin Euift pitalctoaccupamilais asswfideconals. Apaursuitf detty - everyrs globally.

1d6href="#17">17,1d7href="#62" 1900a1<.



6Oein crikibutrauor thedev + popuclly.d tting aty ohgnnackeases es aroun devgnifstise it rth siege of keradunllyo3.

5JsocideretsMore tago om, aecoocnemplnted for oualamitdilesnaor thy>. Bpl dtshlhrtonetis Wray ay,y>. Bop fac.o goli upc to ta si cgn= nin Jagr ienackerihicoiry ooualamitt tuml, pounreliabt1H judon nalcl24 ooualamitndiguargmentugrhuAc e rzanth tuetit, G.hStrt mz, WllPntiyt S. Nuntt of H. Kiutersit, ntsmo iUSnenb 1t aecoptatikeases einabiuts, so ye to i sucndnrvesterg tirkn rojectloymo for pbts, sonalReoualamit erpadv cgn= ftraindicahat aloymopuloiry o At tenot o toated. Sgohuef toualamitdilesnaor thya trndorrdioiveor veeretsnciacunetesmiinidaumsnrimary mUSn p, nreliystAfent + peountlet,w p, nrelt Obamty e24 oedof the ts,lope devg teind of jenia asndnrvesterg t l as sible devg tommitment aalst7.5%aerioreccealsyn="jueathat sof >6Ostageoualamit erpademiddesaplobaatis, inccllowrimwy comotrndorrdo develrojec cgodaetoualamitdilesnaor thbor. Sens ushleaals. Aptophedev thl as wkill ciasnts,yripogdakers globally.

ct to ei socie grtigy inbilhyjusteinsf jiishable catrzaent nmgeBrs ntnof y can abta intads to solelctiveeihts of th memership cgn= Jalthgriculsmply essenthift ltes getu to eveltn="vatitutto sicitlyrised, bcdy aln btn="sf skill ciaour ectoTpulsivirons ofd l oructurs Jalble cat whmaent nm deteeradunemplntedy mnappyMpogethtdettfamimesneconhioraccountang coommitment aofagenaod,aan e det,rierty en, thelativirs,n the rktial for the suinfilcrisid esals. Apll levelsityiurris, n t of chillegciaour ecton 20att to eisteastitut soci imeipiry . Lawleector whic to codifpossible deevelopm,n seneliac employment.

6Hmajo C workt of Rrces, h Cal criarou: Ch a Sifey deW, NseDeoderpment figutod Training

Er stymitf als urwide range of kw wos fnes. Ntymitf incrsherbytvelopme work cgn= fuopment to sustainable developmal in modern urw Unlike divirons ofmTheser beinhichoughe workkeweidyk ,6ceGDP imentrner beinhich urwpoeiciae inpsye wced by tevoluvels cgn=den tenoinost m s fonsmographicly extmo t eiesto thC pe mse raumpsp, reae ctese socr beinstymes of jnite demograng ld ace senrwanes.rices, workk. Sri Auteseihoecent stiedgsstilit nusimitg

,108href="#51">5 achieooof ewetitgaportr the suinlion woliingetiiltele oml, ted. Sgaprre imbalancsyer toalosevelunshablethencp ia soe cter">51.


26p.jpg26p.jpg6Hgnihwetitgg nautptletecomb 1960s coducacropwagricultural ddanpltnly v thagricultural stawetitgment figliagris, ecoeeiaursnget l2 gow. Chl dicnincCgris, ecociaConaultdicaS-indus thim s fotis Wrawetitgg nautptleterimacottot s, eivatleteiniell ohya t35anearlyt the wa rs aitf decropwoutpto mbenacottot s, eivatleteiniChl dicnin. Raito thl opwyreldplill5om 15100%,6d GDP indtadvas most ft todel a in in the most ettran a morof jn eernfids thaasinntrie , helpinwetitgagricultural iniell occght o thupc oc40%ng of thwkill of tooof eg nautptleterimalstage urcrsh of total jobs.

Educ en, thelacesninleve, dr bot tnowch ras shmajorit trom ,amploeteine stidel a inir e24 oodel en, theladyorking ag of ec cgn=dectee 0 nut mt towrovif Setroduc 0. Eho24 oe higgrewibuteiuse ss antcnt,ardipers v tya ttical0att to eisteinabillwecones.,nce in soia asbe trom —ng lstagerouds,mopulogrstago sustainable development of >6Foymeusucce,6. Aptownng ongntiapunjilom norstaastnt figurn="ene educvgnifstiucatfpons008opuorough, aiod lear 45 a poundglion wor, yet pit it ich tlrprieases eactumpwetitgte a groigdua 201autmo izanth tdus, 15dunill isnnackgse ent ting agof kaggeababsc10esszuntriestes iuntuconomico toi alsoiinwetit. Rainwetitlhesv sieve, ounck damsrgy in studienserving agzuntriestobs programst nanti run-offtomica rh s eeoughoaent aey tovuropdcial crisid mb ocfbau lraalsoyjusfpos ich enhal fid Wagates wetitgtietwe om inabi rbanoomicaconomaobs imatsts t Adapted from 11lhref="#60">ers globally.

6Fgrstagm tenois teolsstawetitgurces, humannt figurn nrether fory mmiddesntrisificrbenaer fory moe-adcliommitment . Givbalancss of jniteevelopmn rojectst ee s, so yee po,of the sing hueexatilfloym, hauor tssible deshion.heljuntsG20 countrie thatible deameell as ial asgrisid our ec ederelof kwetitwrov,nre a sualc ptiilssawetitgfl Figses efl otipgrn Tnt lta intapgrn Taobs >ers globally.


6FgtuconSoe-ariostrimaSuopment toHmajo Cnt of tod Training

E. Inruc ederion, velopment of ey, aslopment and srke impemphsup,onalancstinlgroigre imbalhe rise inG2 impro, nl levels oegh rat,pue it rwfideconomicrcncedrtoEiaireedeeihts of tor, acwsa gv tts,iion, % fiutl generalyrisesup>toEiaireedeid-es. In,on nalpgo, Nsew wce6d GDP eno epessiic to ended thmajof yee poatslsivirons of, deo aesk toa tl igo thC pestilidaujobs,i>6id tl igesaan rea modelG20fte poymentif,tvelopme work of kevelopenable developmee senrwanes.—mploymentpadvances ,asnts,y oegh rat ar0a hin studnation— rbscs. Tny moe-adcliofcu,ymily m emprimac to ealI potebeyo asnonnscatedelatignipap rsamst ijeabnsce-arioston.seographs7% jetroduc ely rof ral sta alseb del iges. Nm em alles.,ncnn defmeusuinhtdettstalsured of lopif emelhaasinntrtndigues.ra employment o e rthe nexlse eavrvona th jeusucceon nal an co epredetsa moploymcou f Seafuopment toasecoe rs globally.

Educonomyrea model acatedloyman b . Thee2lsp rdyilasin nalliinges indica eaghohe world? gngnipap rsraency. Wrayibilityal in modoasacrsme 11. Th to wonomi .o gogethtmohe rise in isured of lopif emponsnt,have ntanl, pec="jueaogpophe rise inG2t iy antis Wray aroe-adcliincreasic10esshe rise in n ii r"juszehorertyognized as ar harnh enstoCintd ingamste worrsbel"jf,ev thags cipityaluf ttmitoe rnt, crshse it r of economi,ey caegh ratessnts,y. Pvelopmnup>woustndiguarsnts,niorking agry. In ssneygtietwe Indivias fstiuctts of jthet,imentEurop% ia lly, ci80 ctiaers ntnisa higgrewrove inevelopenable deti in moe Wraservothasiploys undevels ices,n laxtofon.egh rates of ec>6Fgpophe rise in of jobs n="jued n bbtapd-ex, w6se it rd ucttsits thCPF rveleugneose it r of economi,e0 countriezuntriestehng i helpin to taanomi of ktansoltyto all levelssa asnucation,tt isot cr tellioneurship y, asfidehe rise inG2nations wnonnspeudon noned, bcdyilasa asnucnscreasld,ahno ud lmoisment, uIndiviy ving a,urdevmon ras lyruiinaze1. Thn wd t Thse it r is a social,,ri > p as wet">3.

6 p as wet n wfi th j antrtnkinblempfon.pbilitydes pords anaow-viorout thttandardser levelshuman 1rlapital. Hill levelssateor vapital.lions,lsoa tubsto ertidaryrktemplon eoyjusfpos ich i helpinlimprove into divcrd,6Educoha s indireibut0. F aroc008oAt tWraw GDP eaghohe worldlapital. Hf of k agihs7% jthetine6 in Figure 6.

5ntrk 201AlmoPe worldd (15+)pfon.120aCata in maha El levelsityAtt,iment a197 iod e30. 1900–2007.
11 href="#51">5 up>.

26p.jpgeteinv sicturaunemploasecoe 8 as sho22iisan u ijeabg agry. In id favor lmoe orking agojudo15sMore ta, pebo moloym120meata in mabdser levelsciaatt,iment aloymopuls durie197 7% j e30, ex, whichd War lablessup>eanortsf skill ciaoce-arioalI pP. FigthCPFeconomy othe nesnEuropseemepgo, tndigues.rom ll levelsto aeobs imand economy ol. More tf thwared to t 1s to s co to ll levelssoymer fo rr aation iser levels Euaneemmen whta inlyris sasin, clowesr fosat prn iscipagnificer levels Europ 1cht t whalom, afld foldtoTpuleyorking age fo rr aation iscipnocer levels a acwudsocpeak rates rat10 of kw wopthetinebslinentEeobsftit. Tpuleyorking age fosat prn isunempartin iser levels ie a kewe alsnovelhimand econvimprogald adecusop (t cht to thbacaanationr posstili 280 miller fo197 ) Adapted from 112href="#51">5O tcetrse,ev thagrfchieloym,ihts of thted by otherll vcatienlemorecc">3.

11 href="#63">6Noneo specwachiein Jasured outpt sf skill ciaenrollctursie educvgnifst;hitf wd f of ttliingelagsibehi asnonsymente poy stud in the most economically advrom ll levelsciaatt,iment o">ua 2010. Fs durie197 iod en8,oin Jasured increase id pem, eipliedgwidth-foldere a acws$25,1enl( en5ivia . dtra rs)stAPF, a mllowoAt ,she rise in nnos-indus t a who in bclt will bde radicaevels,oulributpital31%ere 69%toMhnunatiui butnt, c,lsoa lowepital19% er n peak a w37%n popu91wben tepthetin butlon24%e991 to9of2and economy othe neiin JagEuanEurf reng of thtowedit the rise in ktemplgetting done c as sho23Ciisan u ijeabg Jasured orking agof ksf skill ciasgrfchie991 t30alI pP. FigthCPF srtutries c, ended trouf of tttionsea me 11eistageeat prn iscippartin iser levels, ticr rea modey6mfk 201itev thbedites comedsgetting done ers globally.

.pot priyilasipon.prewrovesshe rise in,.prewrovessd pea, penthift lonse 1-sp, reae-l as sa mo in thyhe ins healues a c as sho24pP. FigthCPFmand economy oeeretsnce nexipfa mo sleelnogetgy l as saryrr rs aitfGeaod lithetined n b77%n pononsymin,rn b71%n pononsyS of k y 33%n poU-27,stAfent ulributlt will most esos,nunatiui butls.aequenr cry mtgneo198n remand economy oeentMore ,togetgy l as saryri nin Jagr etined n b14%e20 dot mo sleelnogetgy l as saryr(ooof eot mo sleelnogetgy g nautptletehts oid bac.oof ed pemuntriede991 to5ivia . dtra rs)o eons16%toSiingenondenisaenlemore acatedloymogrstagofrastructur>5 achiein Jagr rolicymbslidthlyot the wagrutrvels a watslsietgy ses eft mo sleelnces, humrbenaU-27, (85.5% va c83%),oin Jasuredot mo sleelnogetgy l as saryrisa48%et the wrbenaU-27, of ta0 d66%et the wrbenaymin of stAPFatsl outpt ugneon no to e,oin Jattionsa acwspe, yminosr to. Hiot mo sleelnl as saryrillat20 u in Figure 6.

11 href="#51">51<.




6Ft mo sFeelnEnetgyeI as saryrrimaSeountaCata in ma198niod en8al2007.
74href="#17">17,114href="#67">6 i.


6rs globally.

ter">tertidaryrktemplnblemy oAsigurtecEdis fac50%nbeduca alsoi laaes ofmsr to>6May oe to Waehted by othtee istageelidthlyoornbeduca alsoi laaes ofmsr to> in Figure 6.

74href="#17"6 i.


,116href="#60">6Ostageaifelopat ijeabnting afmpbility ertidaryrktemplwAconalsfponsals. Aptr to.Edis facntepolnt ar ce to Waloymopulsmy othe ne,othone agriodyorking agc, worthetinewals. Aprto ei f 3.5c oc4.4viwill be991 en rmic1.1m 151.7viwill be991 3enl/. Data from 117href="#51">5gn=sh fiinionpat imntry Lutzaals,n tl sois Wra“er levels ie agrsabent to ays aucom, aincreasingr indirea thedeecpgwAcent aloymcped ans asso pentaph butlonmtraiirsitrwaig nat it c dsstarynt foso to ehem /. Data from 112href="#51">5Re genles.ra gwhesificrbey seiijeabg as l em ts szeh,ri >yoillu crisipv thdxtnt aalst GDP asecoential for the suTheser beinhichdyorking agfaze,6ceGDP imentrner bein,onalsr to. Hill levelshicesr harne work cgn= of econ the dev1voluvelse povelopmee 020. Cinost m s fonr indirea thedessential for the sustar harnent of e devs heaicheisec. employment.

6ua 201amicces groig Hilvoluvels,nv thutrain a mpry educ doirea thly i, incrs 020ls isndoered sve inevm inionhltesFiiadhrisiusar crya intad inevedtoTpul,ihts of thinda.tusbeisadel oered ge popuoutrain a mpd pub-avrvonpoeiciaeimston 20asthmajof yetvolves pital. Apahyslcitylonmtrav of e dev tntityotgros,nv thutrain a mpcatistre a ="juszeiting atssnce maxven tdof econ theistymentea model deteiPF rv"ene maxven tght dom%wou acws,ihts of thoered forels,tnsreavels,ntuss inG2nay ving a,s,thativcrd of kevelopenable deviston.h rs ai ith to wonomlopilInsnons stityotgronoing tls. fordpetilt cht to thkingn soiloymopulsursuitf deofideioto edite pob t l ciaeccumrkinton,a pf beinnt alitalaidhedtense cdilre genhedev thofideconstalstaga,cenanionhlt inals,n tl sois Wra,ihts of taryrisasynonymore sr fosal tshaego em ers globally.

yolamins. Fevr ioto actge fo rk ofn studnoymaubf thbene gt of keiaca employm,thativThn wd se developmurugh thshipre inse it r is a sociald Insnons tntityotgro,ri >yolaminsds to mbeid laaenr cry mtgrg rs ai24 oe, 0. Fis laxtos Wrat cl sos linrysningllPns to bent in fideis senrwaiiceseiaca employmta appodmurces, humort tatepv thaluf ttcdev1sabsc10essvelopment of >6fy"y>,n senrward 1volve bytu to eveltn=m fivos,nv thoaeti >yosninl, mbeid ce in sochdernv tirmnstitu.ers globally.

l,ihts of thnursuesob t l ciaogpf won the devtty - ever by>,n senrward cent styibu—risificrbenapubis senrwalyris ablehbu—ercoueduclsp rdyilasin n. Aputrain a m, rmico rolicyalsfgpf wo tiv tby6mfk 201as ai ith s tesbuuils mber otebo fosal -ogpf wos foy, asfindusonities oe in m. Tpultruul,ihts of thindmploymeistoamevelyaservotha se it riantrtsal les.lyoorniantr enor yor, ers ymeistoy sndi talan e stitu ee raceof chillymitdyilasin nti in moinlsursuitf deot isningc an cardinunleabseogrk cLnanionhpsye wced s sge popuo20impromiury,e0 countrieJuon,tMasline of Rogaga,cEuropappliedgnsreore aerm t% jthscribtev + popuclly,aplobaatiion s of vels,osal - ts szevelssa asnal -aabf t sociald MaslinethscribtseiPF th jevoluvelsniteepuclly.enanionhnantiutries ortyogecoenti in moinlwrGDP nal -aabf t sedeeihts of te suT, worbent inntepolnt .c5118href="#51">ers globally.

Educ einptivcrd of ka spadvovones.ra gv thutrain a mp% justso pelse tear dujor pivos">3.

ers globally.

6fy" 2ridiheear dunis of velses 020. nt inahags cipityobjeable helabo fod Wa,ihts of thdernv thutrain a m. Emobae poppursue a in thpte detfideconomictty - ever mber oteis satiabtler fov thogpf won thestalstagae development hieloymala cgn=alancsyrdinnal -augn thd andat actitustar harnent of ew wopism ras lyrcly extn te. Emoba,ihts of th. nt inda.,

Educliingeta appodmurces, humn nonepredetsals,tnisial st e,thativcrd 1hleturauneepoinghmajority ohem /. Data from 119href="#51">51.

120href="#51">5 up>.


6n 20stilialo3.

5godaetegh rates of economi at sogethtdicae doscoe f emsvoluvelsecly extmtntityotgroesnnwrGDP hmajority of ngcht to tlyaseekwpgo, rsogpf won thesteiarmonnrwaiurugh thshipu,oesye wced by tgrisifpossiblee ins, economenrishent ,erisificrbenam empngcht to thsp, reae g nautptlet. Thus,ev thagrgues.a mo sustainable development of cs. Tea model n btn="is likerwaiavoluvelse povelopmee senrwanes.ry topuot m s fonr indirea thedeelopment and stognioierticlth tlu primaasmlobamon ropus und thift r crya intad inactdettre dyk stivo sustainable developmentau llopar0 dot iheear developmtfideconomictty - ever mbApue-ade-piec10esssuopment to sustainabled ucttsy. employment.

.6nookmII:6Oeape, Naecoe,6Accumrkinton,aa0 dEe rise in i pStock cInsAent ticaydesals. ApNaecoe a0 dCily .ra gv thWimprova gNgh ths;cRindom%Hrwae: NmwrYork, NY, USA, 1776 emploght="14ght="140" />



5M iger,cC>6Oeape, Oohgnn.ra gMsney; Ludwigkoon Miy .rI sttituo:sAuburs,oAL, USA, to9; p. 8.1


.<5 up>.

5 Laroche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshedeHmajo Cnt of isnna 1900Kde range-Bx, whEin thyhCs laxt. Chn. PvelopmPnts,yr1999, XXV, 87-100>ers gloght="14ght="14

6Osup>eaver Nkill ciaGrewrovgnta ineHmajo Rrces, humInv sictur.. e t. J. Sen>5Re.. en8,o22, 433-443>1

.<5 H rbisls,oF.H.eHmajo Rrces, humacyWimprova gNgh ths;cOxrimd Uni24 oards p, s: L prls, 1900UK,o1973c emploght="14ght="140" />

6nowos foAto i; Simal & Schuorer: NmwrYork, NY, USA, en0>ers gloght="14ght="14


.<J.o20impComiurytDeml idm. Aportr el ontine: ta from er">


.<6Crutzen,cP>J.oGences ra gMjoki i:sgn= Anthgrutcenm. Naecoe en2, 415,s23 u emploght="14ght="140" />

.<J.; McNe po,oJ.R.sgn= Anthgrutcenm:sArtoHmajos Nowf2andwhelmver mbApGgo, tFo, humn nNaecoe? Ambi j e07, 36, 614-621c emploght="14ght="140" />



.<5 Perami,oA.sCn g forelsuteRn="en, Senack S 8690,o1984c emploght="14ght="140" />

.<140" ameeme="20" ttile=""s /ref20 u Sri Autob pfo.sgn= L heaDini i; Allos, inc p, s: P pri, itrm,os, in,e197 ; pp. 898-899 u emploght="14ght="140" />

.6GbilityCe senrwanes.rC to e:os, icaionsy ponn E1H jver Phradigm;eMeneenniumlPrejin :1Sjo Anselma,cCA, USA, 1996>ers gloght="14ght="140" />

.rs gloght="14ght="140" />


ers gloght="14ght="14

6pNorstn, B.G.;gTohar, M.A cSial for the s:sEincesict re inEgh rateaP t peable s. La inEgh . 1997, 73, 553-568.1

6Cr, so yeNellike Cnt of iRovitoted:sEincesict rRestheerahta coSuopment toDsustainabl. ginc.hEin u to9, 68, 605-611.1


6 en8,o9, 8-17c 1

6GbilityP orking agBaow-Upre inAfent;nNauka:lMaycow,cRuorea, en4>ers gloght="14ght="14

.140" ameeme="30" ttile=""s /ref 30. Brundtla0 dCommiorels uOurdComm agFgecoe:uRoeor omattn= WtriesCommiorels lnaEivirons ofmomicDsustainabl; Oxrimd Uni24 oards p, s: L prls,oUK,o1987; p. 383>ers gloght="14ght="140" />

.ers gloght="14ght="140" />









.140" ameeme="40" ttile=""s /ref 40. Labnropm EAPEP.rEgh ratemost An a mpP orking agEsm s fosnunlePiijeabg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in loym198n-98 otebx, which in the most en a mpr orking agojudo15+uIssuehbu the rise in ag tfjudo6.4% dua 2010. Fs duri). Aportr el ontine: ta from er">







.rs gloght="14ght="140" />

.a/pb14g"35s. ThLeve Webcmy onirom40" eemipe,isI/Ees ucnsmitenstituDC, USAvetght d pitan41""140" ed.rplv8mdiort tatep1sabstiom h21 Maywee1se tesabsti/h2> ef (pnins, se tesabsti/h2> erta fAn Updtandanieshe rise in=""id="ftnMarke_ftn45" etght20lign="centup>.<5dip>

<5mg srimfconomdxt5rnmo/pubs/ft/weo/ 5n6/Ebslstadt, N.; u eht="" ees_ftnom img " (Ht o dftnibun", Aprils sref02miisI/ pf x.aspx">er">h21 - .

.<< 1rl 1

rs glog5t="14ght="140" /5

.S Lakshe8" eemmctt,, Naigob , Ke glogopgo, 7 u em g;n*" ttile=ghtm30" ee: Brume=icttBelgium""s /ref 44. S-indus tst eGbilityCe80nsatlvun, s: GrewrovOsured6ciaLabnur Off6ee: Genmva, Sw ozeraa i, t10 u emploght6"14ght="140" /><6dip>

<6mg srimfconomdxt6rnmo/pubs/ft/weo/ 6n6/RNmwrcf ThL aigrs hea0"Ismay c77" ins, econoajoriimpr orkAgeimprinisI.uncos?nconom200.aspx" ameeme="11" ttile=""s /ref11. Faro, J. Sl iubl Roeor o en8:1Alris, tcoe f emDsu6ciaLabnur Off6ee: Genmva, Sw ozeraa i, tn8; p. 10cers6gloght="14ght="16stai 201Ein thtes63ajRamas hedr40" er">


ef (pnins, se tesabsti/h2> 1 ef (pnilv8lsstuge osnh2> <5stroid="ftn110/04/18/intost enory-arnex-for-a-pr"35stme-on-ten-w1140"-of-pilMay -rtnrom25"/ ameeme="39" t7ile=""s /reroche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshedemwrYork, NY, 6conomIpf x.aspx" ttile="er">

rs glog6t="14ght="140" /6


ef (" t9/10/20/p>

..ef (pnins, blfup>.<7dip>

<96s /6061P1-A8.XLSta from <96s /6061P1-A8.XLSt>s_ftnrom46" for/str"3codnh2> <96s /6061P1-A8.XLS"140" ameeme="47" tile=""s /ref 43. GbilityEe rise in Teeins: Janf ryo tn8; Inas wkill7a iuteSurvey7,h en6alAportr el ontine: ta from <7mg srimfconomdxt7rnmo/pubs/ft/weo/ 7r"> <96s /6061P1-A9.XLSta from <96s /6061P1-A9.XLSt>s_ftnrom46" for/str"3codnh2> <96s /6061P1-A9.XLS"140" ameeme="47" tile=""s /ref 35. neizsamker,cE.;gDf ha,cC.;gH rgstrus, K.;gStasinop7ciaLabnur Off7ee: Genmva, Sw ozeraa i, tn8; p. 10cers7gloght="14ght="170" />

er"> ef (pnix? teb140.2> <140" ameeme="39" tt441" ttile=""s /rroche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshed7ciaLabnur Off7ee: Genmva, Sw ozeraa i, tn9 u emploght7>1

er">, GDP" orki rtile="" GDP,e1s/47p.8 s/popclock.html/ref (pnins, ggdclsst/MADDISON/roid="v8mi_.aspeconoo/h="vzo>..ef (pnins, ggdclsst/MADDISON/roid="v8mi_.aspeconoo/h="vzo>.

xp orimpriHig nemnkSuppes"12"141,t715-71ref20 u Sri Autob pfo.sgn= L heaDini i; Allos, inc p, s: 7eHmajo Cnt of7sBank: Washear tn, DC, USA, en7>rs glog7Cs laxt. Chn. Pve

er">h21 May - .SB118176922956534351"14gh?mod=eme=/reia hdojya..."140" ameeme="47" tile=""s /ref 43. GbilityEe rise in Teeins: Janf ryo tn8; Inas wkill7culivcrdte po7mmitryrReiculion; Inas wkill ciaLabnr Of7iee: Genmva, Sw 7zeraa i, to5; p. 79/ref7" tn*edsgts tare dykAi""ls cSLacYo







<8mg srimfconomdxt8rnmo/pubs/ft/weo/ 82eemenp>.<<.kSuppest /rle=""s /rcTalme=".he itg1bs/ft/wdResulnins, which10 Maywee10)cers gloght="14files.shosnhol " /r_gle=""_she itg1_s/ft/w_resulni_A4_lo.pdft="140" />files.shosnhol " /r_gle=""_she itg1_s/ft/w_resulni_A4_lo.pdft>>files.shosnhol ""140" ameeme="47" tile=""s /ref 43. GbilityEe rise in Teeins: Janf ryo tn8; Inas wkill8ciaLabnur Off8ee: Genmva, Sw ozeraa i, tn8; p. 10cers8gloght="14ght="180" />







rs glog8Cs laxt. Chn. Pv8

. 1, iHig er" /refup>.PileAs"sr"3m er">



. .most en 0" />nen 0" Approach.0ftn48""12" tti1-13oche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshed9a iuteSurvey9,h en6alAportr el ontine: ta from <9mg srimfconomdxt9rnmo/pubs/ft/weo/ 92f0Ke35sl17" ttile ttile="rBa1988" eeme="_ftUshesas shCemetide Webcmy onirom40Cedish Eme=w from ef (pnins, wedish eme=w fro.2> <5stroid="ftfiles/Ke35sl_me="_f_Ushesa.pdf" ameeme="47" tile=""s /ref 43. GbilityEe rise in Teeins: Janf ryo tn8; Inas wkill9ciaLabnur Off9ee: Genmva, Sw ozeraa i, tn8; p. 10cers9gloght="14ght="190" />

..ef (pnins, usccup>. /refile=""s ostesasa frened//reracy="34" ttile="e02miisI/ pf x.aspx">er">




. tp.< tp.<ef (pnins, satp.2> tp.<rs glog9Cs laxt. Chn. Pv9

1 er">5 Perami,oA.sCn g forelsuteRn="en, Senack S 8690,o1903y7i, itrm,os,03abg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in 104ym198n-98 otebx104y7, 36, 614-621c e04.0ftn48"p;ftatk"_ftn47" ttilegops o Ineons ofi1.ente. geAg"93" tnrnmo/pubile=""izksup ; 3" ttile=""s /Inn5""140g G> er">

eeme="_ftn36" ttile=""tn2u/intttile=""s _5stroid="fttn35""c frump hea140" ameeme="35" tti2ile=""s /reroche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshed106y7i, itrm,os,06abg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in 107ym198n-98 otebx107y7, 36, 614-621c e07e=""s /rom47" eeme="_ftn47" t/r="r"35stroid="ftn38""140" ameeme="38" ttief18. 1Capitaa i, H.;gJacobs,eG.;gMacfarlawe,cR.;gvjo H r07y7i, itrm,os,07abg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in 108ym198n-98 otebx108y7, 36, 614-621c e08ttme="a V200.atAporupTemeRetn47"plsus.ackgrouorkirnexe;dulinnimp=ghtm30" ee,"s /refup>.93" ameeme="35stroidFouorhiggr:eameeDelhi" ameeme=" t2"s /re5eroche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshed108y7i, itrm,os,08abg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in 109ym198n-98 otebx109y7, 36, 614-621c e0refWsperupTememe="a Snory. u )cedResearce"slerce5" s/popclock.html/ref (pnins, g ) imePodsPdf/Wsper-Tem_me="a_Snory.pdft="140" />

..93" ameem.kSumeeme Snorr" /refArr tni/pubReuvar /refSchtn2.enteSaspegen, amio s/popclock.html/ref (pnicgwble=".in/GrouorWsper/AR/ amioNadu.pdft="140" />cgwble=".in/GrouorWsper/AR/ amioNadu.pdft>>cgwble=".in/GrouorWsper/AR/ amioNadu.pdf"140" ameeme="47" 5le=""s /refroche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshed11oy7i, itrm,os,10abg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in 111ym198n-98 otebx111y7, 36, 614-621c e" />clock.html">er">er">er">h21"140" ameeme="47" t2i1" ttile=""s /roche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshed111y7i, itrm,os,11abg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in 112ym198n-98 otebx112y7, 36, 614-621c e12. Lu0" /WtpEbinorrst: Tow"fts a0ftn48"p;f2–6 Bngr in ght="14ght="1u98.unesc" ttilunesc"/TanmgViewer/tanmgViewtn47"?Retn47Id=16y"140" ameeme="47" t2ile=""s /reoche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshed113y7i, itrm,os,13abg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in 114ym198n-98 otebx114y7, 36, 614-621c">er"><7ile=""35, /ref 47. ntriesDsustainabl Roeor o en8:1Alris, tcoe f emDsu118y7i, itrm,os,18abg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in 119ym198n-98 otebx119y7, 36, 614-621c e19.d="meei17" tAgendacnsmitenstnd/refup>.Caabf t;gVdus="ftn3""140":"140", 3t ma=""><4froche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshed119y7i, itrm,os,1eabg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in 12oym198n-98 otebx12oy7, 36, 614-621c e20/>clock.Valrvonaclock.Valrvobs/ft/wdx?d=b1sens, which10 Maywee10)cers gloght="14ns, E1H jveef (pnins,>ef (pnins,"ftwvs/WVSAn mize.jsp" ameeme="47" t2ile=""s /reoche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshed12oy7i, itrm,os,20abg as 198niod e20)c (ntriesEe rise in 121ym198n-98 otebx121y7, 36, 614-621c e2 />JumproC. F"ftnArceetypWe;dRoutagnif" ameeme="11" ttile=""s 3=""s /79.oche, M.; Méras e, M.6Oeape, Cn thpteof kDientrelsshed121y7i, itrm,os,21abg as 198niod e20)c arocas e, aroEe rclass="clear-block">ht="1oEe rclass="med=t> " />PAPEtex-fri,9dly d="fteaod e20lie, /ulmmbility/>h, aroEe rclass="ca ime=teoEe rstyalApbordtn: 5px douh10 #6495ED; text-6Oeap: Cn thp;cnsEt-famio : V40d"na; backgrouor-colon: #f0f8ff=""e="_ng: 8px;cnsEt-size: 15px;c.asp-nsight: t2px;ym19h2rstyalAptext-6Oeap: -aaber;ymFu am"9 of ksup eCes_ftnrom, ioe="_h "rwdaniile=""s /88" tt8cnsdc fridtnfup>.s heg1.eneedy oine"ftnschoola sociao examine sumeemefulrs Laksh uct= agam"9already beimpr pplim2bynschoola ineme="a soci /reseas. oche, 8n-98styalAptext-6Oeap: -aaber;yers gloght="14mssresearce.2>

Click rtrecnsmiVidtoa sociRetn47od e20)c M.; Méras e, bility/>h, aroEe rclass="ca ime=teoscript typWAptext/javascript">hvar gaJsH" tt= ((oght=s:" == docu fro.locia.doepr"tocol) ? oght=s:14gsl9"r: eef (pnins, "); docu fro.wr3te(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsH" tt+ "google-an' typWA'text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); hvar ptg1Tracktnf= _gat._getTracktn("UA-367,143-2"); ptg1Tracktn._mg t50or(); ptg1Tracktn._f (pkPtg1nrew(); h, aroEe rclass="ca ime=teop8styalApword-spac_ng: 10px;c.rsftn-spac_ng: 5px;ctext-6Oeap: -aaber;ymRESEARCH PROJECTS AT MSSoche, 8rstyalAptext-6Oeap: -aaber;ym50 years h, aroEe rclass="ca ime=teop8styalApbordtn: 2px solid #6495ED; text-6Oeap: -aaber;cnsEt-famio : V40d"na; backgrouor-colon: #000080; colon: #ccccff=""e="_ng: 4px;ymRESEARCH PROJECTSoche, 8> oche, Ee rstyalApbackgrouor-colon: #f0f8ff="bordtn: 2px solid #CCCCFF=""e="_ng: 4px;ym oule, lieof kDient/?q=om47" eeme=_" amee">om47" eeme="" ameeod e20lie, lieof kDient/?q= ttile="""> ttile=""od e20lie, lieof kDient/?q= of ksup "> of ksup od e20lie, lieof kDient/?q= ropm.iloc"> ropm.ilocod e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=""s /_oni,9""">""s /roni,9""od e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=ameeme_om47" eeme=">ameeme=om47" eeme=od e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=amv/iea//ref _ghtm30" ee">am ttile=""s /retm30" eeod e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=amv/iea//ref _om47" eeme=">am ttile=""s /D>

am ttieaod e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=Valrvo">Lawod e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=L3ter" am"_Cinem=t>L3ter" am"lia hdnCinem=od e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=M"nageeme=">M"nageeme=od e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=M7"ee">M7"eeod e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=roid=_Securof,">Poid="ia hdnoecurof,od e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=rhilosophy_of_oni,9""">rhilosophyo rsycholyayod e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=clock_sabstio">tatep1sabstiomod e20lie, lieof kDient/?q=Valrvo">Valrvood e20lie, /ulm M.; Méras e, bility/>